Closed Bug 258439 Opened 20 years ago Closed 20 years ago

make /bugs/ validate

Categories

(www.mozilla.org :: General, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

VERIFIED FIXED

People

(Reporter: annevk, Assigned: annevk)

References

()

Details

Attachments

(2 files, 1 obsolete file)

The patch removes all the presentational markup and replaces it with more
semantic markup. The orange note at the top is replaced with two p.note;
fantasai, you think that is ok? (This is a request for review ;-), it doesn't
seem to be possible to bind that to the attachment in this component.)
Attached patch patch #1 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
QA Contact: daniel.bugmail → nb
No, those two need to be <p class="important">

I'm assuming you didn't cut anything or move stuff around. *is mainly looking
over the new code rather than the changes*

All URIs should be relative to the file itself, not to the root.

+ <p>Bugs and <abbr>RFEs</abbr>

The 's' should be outside the <abbr>.

+   example, problems with table layout should be assigned to 
+   <abbr>HTML</abbr> Tables, not to Layout.

These component names need to be updated.

+   development process. If a bug is marked <tt>mozilla1.3</tt>, it

Some keywords are in <tt>, some are just in quotes. They should all be marked
with <code>. Likewise for bug statuses.

+   <code>cvs diff -u &gt; mypatch.diff</code>. To apply a patch, go to
+   the proper directory and <code>patch &lt; bugpatch.diff</code>.

Use <kbd> for these instead.

\ No newline at end of file

Please add a newline to the end of the file.
QA Contact: nb → daniel.bugmail
Attached patch patch #2Splinter Review
- I did cut one thing. RESOLVED LATER and RESOLVED REMIND. You can't use them
   within Bugzilla anymore so it didn't make sense to let them stay.
 - I changed /projects/bugzilla to bugzilla.org, but that is a logical move.
 - I wonder why URIs should be relative to the file, but I changed it
   (local versions perhaps?).
 - All changed to the CODE element. Do we want some CLASS to make them (more)
   "semantic"?
 - What is the deal with that new line? :-)
Attachment #158203 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Nicolas, could you check this in? Most things became clear for me in the last 24
hours. Besides, it is a big improvement over the current file.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
QA Contact: daniel.bugmail → nbebout
Attached file /bugs/ (file)
Thanks Nicolas, marking FIXED.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Product: mozilla.org → Websites
Component: www.mozilla.org → General
Product: Websites → www.mozilla.org
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: