Closed
Bug 260069
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
long document printed improperly as one page without page break
Categories
(Firefox :: General, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 154892
People
(Reporter: mtgordon, Assigned: bugzilla)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040831 Firefox/0.9.1+ Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040831 Firefox/0.9.1+ The URL above, which should print as at least a two-page document, prints as one page with as much as will fit on that one page. The rest of the document effectively falls off the bottom of the page. It seems to be failing to introduce a page break at the appropriate point. Both print preview and actual hard-copy printing show the same erroneous behavior. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Visit http://www.tech9.net/rml/kernel_book/errata-1e.html 2. File -> Print Preview Actual Results: The text is flowing off the bottom of the page. Expected Results: Whatever doesn't fit on one page should go on the next page. I tried editing the document to see what would make it work. Removing the <div> tags made the page printable (at the expense of the relevant formatting getting ignored).
Reporter | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Summary: long document printed improperly as one page wihtout page break → long document printed improperly as one page without page break
The .main class in ../rml.css has {position: absolute;...}, related to bug 154892?
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
This bug just bit me. I want to print this page: http://www.od.dk/undervisning/roma/Artikler/Peter_ravn2.htm and get only the first page out. Printing to PDF gives me a strange PDF file with the same problem - thus the attachment. Printing from Opera works fine, IE probably also. This is from Windows XP Danish, SP2, to a HP LaserJet 6 Postscript printer.
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
See this was originally filed for Linux. Applies to WinXP, too. Would be setting 'All OS', but don't have permission to do so.
Comment on attachment 174032 [details]
HTML file that prints as one continuous page instead of several.
The attached file exhibits the described behavior (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux
i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041111 Firefox/1.0)
Comment 7•19 years ago
|
||
Yes, looks much like it. 75213 is itself a dup of 154892, and that looks like the behaviour I'm getting. I notice that 'Nobody is working on it' at the moment...
Could this also be a dup of 270827? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=270827
Comment 9•19 years ago
|
||
Yes, I'm confident it is. Which one is the root bug for this report. Seems I don't have the access level to set 260069 and 270827 as dupes of 154892. Someone please do this, it'll clarify the significance of getting this fixed.
Comment 10•19 years ago
|
||
271096 could also be a dup. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271096 192129, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192129 267709, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=267709 267745, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=267745 260024, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=260024
Comment 11•19 years ago
|
||
Yes and no (!). It behaves in the same manner that only one page is printed - that's the bug behaviour. But the reporter seems to complain about something else that also happens here - the margins are being truncated. It's the first time I see this with Firefox, which usually behaves much better than IE in this respect.
Comment 12•19 years ago
|
||
I think these bugs may be able to be labeled as duplicate of https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=270827, as 270827 has a "critical" severity.
Comment 13•19 years ago
|
||
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more reproduction information if you have it. If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. Thank you for your help in this matter. The latest beta releases can be obtained from: Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
Comment 14•19 years ago
|
||
It's a dupe of bug 154892, which has had much activity. But I don't have the priviledges myself to resolve it. Is the reporter around to do it?
Reporter | ||
Comment 15•19 years ago
|
||
Yes, I'm still around. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 154892 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•