Closed
Bug 263512
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
/opt:nowin98 increases code size
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: Build Config, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: bryner, Assigned: bryner)
References
Details
(Keywords: fixed-aviary1.0)
Attachments
(1 file)
588 bytes,
patch
|
bugs
:
review+
bugs
:
approval-aviary+
mkaply
:
approval1.7.5+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Despite the MSDN documentation's claims that it decreases size, when we started using /OPT:nowin98 for Firefox builds (MOZ_DEBUG_SYMBOLS=1), code size increased. Removing the option takes us back to where we were before.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #161500 -
Flags: review?(bugs)
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 161500 [details] [diff] [review] patch r+a=ben@mozilla.org yay
Attachment #161500 -
Flags: review?(bugs)
Attachment #161500 -
Flags: review+
Attachment #161500 -
Flags: approval-aviary+
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
checked in trunk and aviary branch, requesting 1.7 branch approval as well.
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #161500 -
Flags: approval1.7.x?
See related bug 54199 & bug 216333 so we're not constantly revisiting the same issues. I assume the code measurements were done with VC6SP5 ?
Depends on: 54199
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
Windows setup file FirefoxSetup.exe grew 3K from yesterdays build with this checkin (4811K from 4808K). I know it's only a very small increase, but this was supposed to decrease size..
(In reply to comment #5) > Windows setup file FirefoxSetup.exe grew 3K from yesterdays build with this > checkin (4811K from 4808K). What checkin? The only related one I see is bryner's from today to apply the attached patch. It seems strange that code that hasn't changed in 2 years would suddenly cause a 3k increase in file size. And why just remove the /opt:nowin98 from the debug case? What about the NS_TRACE_MALLOC & the MOZ_COVERAGE cases?
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
Maybe I'm confused.... Comment #0 says that using this option code size grew, and that removing it should make the code size shrink. ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/2004-10-07-06-0.9/FirefoxSetup.exe is 4808K ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/2004-10-08-14-0.9/FirefoxSetup.exe is 4811K (built after bryner checked the patch in).
No, I'm the confused one. I thought you were addressing my questions about code size measurements but instead you were pointing out that the patch didn't have the intended effect.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
The issue is that executables built for win98 should have modules that align on 4kb boundaries. Otherwise the system has to do alot of moving around of stuff while loading the progam. Selecting the /opt:nowin98 says that you are building an executable that you do not itend to be run on a windows98 platform. From the MSDN documentation: The only time you should not use /OPT:WIN98 is when your portable executable image is very small. Even if an image is slated for downloads, the wasted space is zero-filled and compresses well. So, if we are trying to reduce the size of the download, the impact on size should be minimal. The impact on startup time on win98 is probably significant. This has more of an impact on the disk space used on the desktop system after installation than it does on download size. Building without the /opt:nowin98 is the right thing to do even if it does make the build 3kb larger.
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
Should have mentioned that my guess is that this option would effect startup time on Windows/ME as well because it is essentailly a renamed Windows/98. Sorry for bugspam.
Comment 11•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 161500 [details] [diff] [review] patch a=mkaply
Attachment #161500 -
Flags: approval1.7.x? → approval1.7.x+
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•20 years ago
|
||
Ok, my measurements were flipped (oops!). The real cause of the size increase I was looking for was /FIXED:NO (see bug 263680). For reference, here's what I see on a firefox static build, VC6SP5 (taking one dll as representative of dlls, and then the exe): with /opt:nowin98: xpcom.dll 378955 firefox.exe 7021645 without /opt:nowin98: xpcom.dll 393294 firefox.exe 7028816
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago → 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•