Closed
Bug 263775
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
win32 build faling if .l/.y libicalss files are newer than checked-in .c files
Categories
(Calendar :: Internal Components, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INCOMPLETE
People
(Reporter: vlad, Unassigned)
Details
In other-licenses/libical/src/libicalss, we have the source icalsslex.l and icalssyacc.y files as well as the generated icalsslex.c/icalssyacc.[ch] files. However, there are no rules to build icalsslex.c from icalsslex.l, or the yacc files from the .y in any makefile. Building locally, if the .l/.y files are newer, make helpfully tries to rebuild the .c files, and calls "flex -t $srcdir/icalsslexer.l > icalsslexer.c", which gets me an icalsslexer.c in the objdir that doesn't build, due to missing flags in the flex invocation. The makefiles should be taught how to build the .c files from the .l/.y, or it should be told that the .c files don't depend on the .l/.y.
Updated•20 years ago
|
QA Contact: brantgurganus2001 → bsmedberg
Updated•19 years ago
|
QA Contact: benjamin → libical
Updated•18 years ago
|
Component: libical → Internal Components
Comment 1•18 years ago
|
||
The bugspam monkeys have been set free and are feeding on Calendar :: Internal Components. Be afraid for your sanity!
QA Contact: libical → base
Updated•18 years ago
|
Assignee: gray → nobody
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
Vlad, would this bug still be valid in the current trunk / 0.8pre branch nightlies?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
Aiee, I really have no idea..
Comment 4•17 years ago
|
||
mvl, could you pls offer some thoughts on this? (if any)
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
Resolving incomplete.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•