Closed
Bug 264184
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
DevEdge is dead, Need to resurrect documentation
Categories
(www.mozilla.org :: General, defect)
www.mozilla.org
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: adalbert.homa+mozilla, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 Firefox/0.10.1 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 Firefox/0.10.1 The DevEdge site was for the X years the best site for any developer. Now that is dead, HTML, CSS, JS documentation is gone. Any search using google or even the mozilla.org website has hundreds of references all pointing to a dead web site. Any junior or intermediate developer looking for information will have this major problem. Mozilla.org should take an active role in resurrecting the lost documentation. All references on the websites associated with Mozilla.org should be changed. Netscape is dead, long live Mozilla. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Go to http://devedge.netscape.com
Component: Web Developer → webmaster@mozilla.org
OS: Windows 2000 → All
Product: Documentation → mozilla.org
Hardware: PC → All
Version: unspecified → other
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/private/css-d/2004-October/034609.html has the following comment: The HTML and CSS sidebars having disappeared along with the contents of http://devedge.netscape.com/ ... There are zipped copies to download for local use on the following link: http://www.tntluoma.com/sidebars/
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
Theme Builder info for Netscape 6.2 is still available, the buildtool.xpi is gone, as it was a beta for Netscape6.2. I don´t know the relevance of the document, how outdated it is regarding current code, I´m not using or making themes. http://wp.netscape.com/eng/mozilla/ns6/themes/index.html
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
fixed URL, was http://devege.netscape.com, now http://devedge.netscape.com
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
Some articles are available at web.archive.org: http://web.archive.org/web/20031215154156/http://devedge.netscape.com/
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 266703 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 267093 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
fantasai, are this the kind of things DevMo will host?
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
It's back. Leaving this open for the moment in case the content will actually move to mozilla.org. Mitchell, do you know if Netscape has any plans in donating the content to us?
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
From the Netscape Browser Prototype FAQ: Q: Will Netscape DevEdge be re-launched?" A: We are currently in the process of handing this off to the Mozilla foundation. http://community.netscape.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?webtag=ws-nscpbrowser&nav=messages&tid=63&tsn=1
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
Yes, I am working with AOL to get this to happen. I'd like to be able to do more than simply post the old documentation, I'd like for the Mozilla community to be able to maintain and improve these docs as well. I am optimistic that the Mozilla Foundation will have the ability to make these documents publicly available again. There has been a delay because I was swamped with Firefox 1.0 launch activities, but I'm working on this again now. Mitchell
Comment 11•20 years ago
|
||
It seems to be offline again... :(
Comment 12•20 years ago
|
||
Mitchell: what's the status of this now? I'd be happy to help out if you need a hand.
Comment 13•20 years ago
|
||
We have the content. There is work going on to get it organized a bit (not public I believe).
Comment 14•20 years ago
|
||
We do have the content. We are working to identify the still-valuable parts of that content and to migrate that into a new system (Wiki) as quickly as possible (JavaScript Reference is close to being done, JS Guide is up next). If you have specific content you are concerned about, please feel free to comment here or email me about it so we can be sure it is prioritized properly. If you would like to help migrate the content into the wiki, all the better. Development wiki is here: http://developer-test.mozilla.org/docs/index.php/Main_Page
Comment 15•20 years ago
|
||
Deb, is there any reason we cannot post the entirety of the site somewhere public as-is so that the content is available to people besides you? That way other people can help you migrate content based on what /they/ think is important (just as volunteers help mozilla.org fix bugs /they/ think are important), and the web development community at large can have access to a resource that otherwise would be locked away until you personally had a chance to go through and sort through it all.
Comment 16•20 years ago
|
||
If that is done, we should suggest that no-one links to it (with some banner at the top), as it is going to be moved elsewhere.
No, we should instead set up a URL structure that mirrors devedge's and *encourage* people to link to it by search-replacing their links to devedge. Then we can redirect what we move later. Giving people an easy way to fix all their broken links will mean that there will be more links to the content and it will be used more.
Comment 18•20 years ago
|
||
And noting that the site is under construction, materials isn't all reviewed yet would be helpful. Mitchell
Comment 19•20 years ago
|
||
a temp mirror of the old devedge is now online, see http://www.mozillazine.org/talkback.html?article=6458
Comment 20•19 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 275850 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 21•19 years ago
|
||
We now have http://devedge-temp.mozilla.org/, and most of the (good) content is moving over to http://developer.mozilla.org/.
Assignee: web.developer → nobody
QA Contact: www-mozilla-org
Comment 22•18 years ago
|
||
devmo has all the good stuff now, plus we have devedge-temp.mozilla.org
| Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Websites
| Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Component: www.mozilla.org → General
Product: Websites → www.mozilla.org
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•