Closed
Bug 264211
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
terminate spreadfirefox account of user sending spam
Categories
(Marketing :: General, task, P1)
Marketing
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: dbaron, Assigned: bart)
Details
spreadfirefox spam has been seen on developer lists: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.svg.devel/28807 This gives a bad impression of the Mozilla project. Please close the spreadfirefox account of the person sending this message. (spreadfirefox also needs better administrative contact info. There's no admin email on the site, and it's not clear who should own this bug.)
| Reporter | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Severity: normal → critical
Priority: -- → P1
The same person has spammed the list again: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.svg.devel/28822
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
contacted this person and asked him to stop spamming. then forwarded him this bug URL and asked if he will promise to stop spamming. if he agrees, will leave the acct active. if not, we will consider de-activating his account (not sure how the sfx admins feel about that).
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
Added a Report Abuse link on the homepage (in the About box).
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
Leaving the account active isn't acceptable. Spreadfirefox seems to have some element of being a competition -- who can spread the most. Unless you terminate the account, there's a competitive advantage to spamming. Furthermore, not terminating the account does not express mozilla.org's disapproval in a strong enough way.
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
I disagree. If the guy wants to make another account he can, under another name. Terminating his account accomplishes next to nothing and might even drive him to further abuses as revenge under a new account. I think bart's approach was perfect. Honey rather than vinegar and all that. This has already wasted far more time than it's worth.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
Right now we're rewarding him for sending spam by showing him as #75 on the top affiliates list (assuming I'm correctly understanding what the links in the spam do): http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates/top250 For people who take this competition seriously, that's rewarding him for sending spam. We should not be doing that, and the id sent out in spam should not be allowed to appear in the top affiliates list, etc.
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
I've got no problem with dropping his affiliate status back to zero. That's a wholly different thing than cancelling his account.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
Great idea. Let's do that. I'll ask Daryl to do so and will update the Content Guidelines page to make this clear.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
this user acct has been deleted (not by me, not sure what happened).
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
I believe this was blake after the account holder was unwilling to shape up.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•