Closed
Bug 264980
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
[MASv1.8a2++] Installer crashes when using Alt-N key on 'Select Components' step of 'Custom' install
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: Installer, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
seamonkey1.0alpha
People
(Reporter: sgautherie, Assigned: ssu0262)
References
Details
(Keywords: crash, regression)
Attachments
(1 file, 2 obsolete files)
|
724 bytes,
patch
|
dveditz
:
review+
dveditz
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Discovered while testing (at least some) nightlies for bug 263653: This seems to have regressed between v1.7.3 and _before_ v1.8a4 releases; that would need narrowing :-/ [Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910] (release) (W98SE) Works fine. (and at least the "end" of v1.8a4 trunk before) [Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.8a4) Gecko/20040927] (release) (W98SE) and current trunk up to Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.8a5) Gecko/20041018 1. Start (Windows full installer) install... 2. Select "Custom" 3. On "Select Components" step, press Alt-N (to go to Next page) result: crash ! {{ SETUP a causé une défaillance de protection générale dans le module USER.EXE à 0003:00009e46. Registres : EAX=c003322f CS=17b7 EIP=00009e46 EFLGS=00000202 EBX=000216bf SS=4327 ESP=000081e8 EBP=0069820c ECX=00010000 DS=16bf ESI=3b380064 FS=35a7 EDX=8160647c ES=016f EDI=000264bc GS=0000 Octets à CS : EIP : 67 3b 46 20 75 59 8e c0 26 83 3e 68 00 00 75 4f État de la pile : 000264bc 3b380064 064616bf 00001767 00050b1c 01110403 3b380064 000264bc 00690008 062b8264 0005176f 3b380064 000264bc 82d04327 00060000 37d30000 }} Odd, because Alt-N works perfectly on previous install steps... This could be related to bug 261857; yet, mouse clicking Next button works fine for me: it's only a keyboard issue.
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
Serge: not much changed in the windows installer since 1.7. just testing alpha releases would probably be sufficient.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1) > Serge: not much changed in the windows installer since 1.7. just testing alpha > releases would probably be sufficient. I could reduce the regression time frame to a 2-week period :-| (no much nighlies available on http://archive.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/ for that long time frame) Works: 2004-06-25-09-trunk 2004-06-26-09-trunk Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.8a2) Gecko/20040626 Crashes: 2004-07-12-15-trunk Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.8a2) Gecko/20040712 2004-07-18-09-trunk 2004-08-19-10-trunk
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
that narrows it down pretty well: http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=default&module=all&branch=HEAD&branchtype=match&dir=mozilla%2Fxpinstall%2Fwizard%2Fwindows&file=&filetype=match&who=&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=2&date=explicit&mindate=2004-06-26+08%3A00%3A00&maxdate=2004-07-12+15%3A00%3A00&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot
Depends on: 47762
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
Sean, this looks like you (see check-in link above). And change your CVS account address to one that works!
Assignee: general → ssu0262
| Reporter | ||
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
'blocking1.8a5=?': (installer) crash (with regression timeframe), with (mouse) workaround...
Flags: blocking1.8a5?
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
not gonna make it. we should get this first thing in a6.
Flags: blocking1.8a5? → blocking1.8a5-
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
| Reporter | ||
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
[Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.8a5) Gecko/20041122] (release) (W98SE) Bug still there. (of course) Asa commented "we should get this first thing in a6."...
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.8alpha6
| Reporter | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Flags: blocking1.8a6?
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
sean or dveditz, any chance one of you can work up a fix for alpha6?
Flags: blocking1.8a6? → blocking1.8a6+
| Reporter | ||
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
[Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.8a6) Gecko/20050104] (nightly) (W98SE) (Bug still there.)
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
We need to get this fixed, but it's not a topcrash and we'd like to get the tree open for beta sooner than later. If a patch happens today, we might still be able to squeeze it in.
Flags: blocking1.8b+
Flags: blocking1.8a6-
Flags: blocking1.8a6+
Comment 11•20 years ago
|
||
Sean, are you working on this?
Comment 12•20 years ago
|
||
It's crashing on the call to CallWindowProc at the end of NewListBoxWndProc (dialogs.c line 1335), but inside about 7 frames of user32.dll. I'm not sure what to make of that.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 13•20 years ago
|
||
[Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050212] (nightly) (W98SE) (Bug still there.)
Summary: Installer crashes when using Alt-N key on 'Select Components' step of 'Custom' install → [MASv1.8a2++] Installer crashes when using Alt-N key on 'Select Components' step of 'Custom' install
Whiteboard: [TimeFrame: See comment 2 and 3]
Comment 14•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3) > that narrows it down pretty well: > > http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=default&module=all&branch=HEAD&branchtype=match&dir=mozilla%2Fxpinstall%2Fwizard%2Fwindows&file=&filetype=match&who=&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=2&date=explicit&mindate=2004-06-26+08%3A00%3A00&maxdate=2004-07-12+15%3A00%3A00&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot I´ve been looking around a bit, and found in the resource script only one dialog having 2 styles, is that o.k., or was it forgotten to delete line 250 when line 251 was added? http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsview2.cgi?diff_mode=context&whitespace_mode=show&subdir=mozilla/xpinstall/wizard/windows/setuprsc&command=DIFF_FRAMESET&file=setuprsc.rc&rev1=1.61&rev2=1.62&root=/cvsroot http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpinstall/wizard/windows/setuprsc/setuprsc.rc#248 248 249 DLG_MESSAGE DIALOG DISCARDABLE 0, 0, 236, 34 250 STYLE DS_MODALFRAME | WS_POPUP | WS_VISIBLE | WS_CAPTION 251 STYLE DS_MODALFRAME | WS_MINIMIZEBOX | WS_POPUP | WS_VISIBLE | WS_CAPTION | WS_SYSMENU 252 CLASS "MozillaSetupDlg" 253 FONT 8, "MS Sans Serif" 254 BEGIN 255 CTEXT "",IDC_MESSAGE,0,0,236,34,SS_CENTERIMAGE 256 END 257
| Reporter | ||
Comment 15•20 years ago
|
||
Per comment 14 suggestion. I have no compiler: Could you compile/test/(super-)review this patch ? Thanks. PS: Could you update your "unreferenced" 'dveditz+bmo@cruzio.com' on <http://www.mozilla.org/hacking/reviewers.html> ? Thanks.
Attachment #174245 -
Flags: superreview?(dveditz)
Attachment #174245 -
Flags: review?(dveditz)
Comment 16•20 years ago
|
||
dan, when you get free from 1.0.1 can you help with reviews here?
Flags: blocking1.8b2+
Flags: blocking1.8b+
Flags: blocking1.8a6-
Flags: blocking1.8a5-
Comment 17•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 174245 [details] [diff] [review] (Av1) <setuprsc.rc> [Checked in: Comment 22] r+sr=dveditz
Attachment #174245 -
Flags: superreview?(dveditz)
Attachment #174245 -
Flags: superreview+
Attachment #174245 -
Flags: review?(dveditz)
Attachment #174245 -
Flags: review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 18•20 years ago
|
||
This patch fixes the crash. Not sure how the crash really happens, but an old window proc was being reused inappropriately without being cleaned up before hand. Might have been a memory corruption of some type. Added a new window proc for the different subclassing being done. Also added a mothod to unsubclass when exiting the respectible dialogs. Cleaned up some various unreferenced vars too.
Attachment #174964 -
Flags: review?(dveditz)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 19•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 174964 [details] [diff] [review] (Bv1) patch v1.0 >Index: dialogs.c >=================================================================== >RCS file: /cvsroot/mozilla/xpinstall/wizard/windows/setup/dialogs.c,v nits only: > HWND hwndLBFolders; > >+ hwndLBFolders = GetDlgItem(hDlg, 1121); You could leave one space only before '=', (could be done elsewhere too, or not) and may be join these two lines into one.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 20•20 years ago
|
||
addressing the nit pick of extra spaces (compared to patch v1.0).
Attachment #174964 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #175059 -
Flags: review?(dveditz)
| Reporter | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #174964 -
Attachment description: patch v1.0 → (Bv1) patch v1.0
Attachment #174964 -
Flags: review?(dveditz)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 21•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #20) > addressing the nit pick of extra spaces (compared to patch v1.0). Good :-) Yet, why not do the |h* = GetDlgItem()| merging part too, on the 3 place, like {{ HWND hSTMessage = GetDlgItem(hDlg, IDC_MESSAGE); /* handle to the Static Text message window */ }} is ?
Comment 22•20 years ago
|
||
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050222 Build ID: 2005022205 There was a checkin today, 2005-02-22 01:15, but it didn´t fix the bug. mozilla/ xpinstall/ wizard/ windows/ setuprsc/ setuprsc.rc Is this file used by a tinderbox compile? http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/bonsai/cvsview2.cgi?diff_mode=context&whitespace_mode=show&subdir=mozilla/xpinstall/wizard/windows/setuprsc&command=DIFF_FRAMESET&file=setuprsc.rc&rev1=1.62&rev2=1.63&root=/cvsroot I deinstalled, deleted the chrome folder, didn´t change the plugin folder holding java for all my mozillas... Did a download of yesterdays (unfixed) and todays (fixed?) exe-installer, tested yesterdays, crashing on Alt-N key on 'Select Components' step of 'Custom' install, also on Alt-B key. tested todays, same behaviour, crashing on Alt-B and Alt-N. Installed using mouse.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 23•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #22) > There was a checkin today, 2005-02-22 01:15, but it didn´t fix the bug. > mozilla/ xpinstall/ wizard/ windows/ setuprsc/ setuprsc.rc The .rc file patch is needed, but is not what will fix the crash. The patch from comment #20 has not landed yet, and is what will fix the crash. It is awaiting r=/sr=
| Reporter | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #174245 -
Attachment description: (Av1) <setuprsc.rc> → (Av1) <setuprsc.rc>
[Checked in: Comment 22]
Attachment #174245 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
| Reporter | ||
Comment 24•20 years ago
|
||
Daniel, would you have time to review the v1.1 patch ?
Target Milestone: mozilla1.8alpha6 → mozilla1.8beta2
Comment 25•20 years ago
|
||
who removed 'blocking1.8b2+', and when was this removed? This bug has a patch, why not fix it before it bitrots?
Flags: blocking-seamonkey1.0a?
Comment 26•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #25) > who removed 'blocking1.8b2+', and when was this removed? Seems the field 'blocking 1.8b2' was removed from Product: Mozilla Application Suite and was replaced by field 'blocking-seamonkey1.0a', but without transferring status, and without leaving trace in bug-activity. blocking 1.8b2+ still is seen on 11 bugs core and 1 bug NSS, blocking 1.8b2? is requested from 43 bugs core
Comment 27•20 years ago
|
||
It doesn't have to have blocking status to get fixed
Flags: blocking-seamonkey1.0a? → blocking-seamonkey1.0a+
Comment 28•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 175059 [details] [diff] [review] patch v1.1 [Checked in: Comment 37] r/sr=dveditz Does the forked Firefox/Thunderbird installer also need this fix?
Attachment #175059 -
Flags: superreview+
Attachment #175059 -
Flags: review?(dveditz)
Attachment #175059 -
Flags: review+
| Reporter | ||
Comment 29•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #28) > (From update of attachment 175059 [details] [diff] [review] [edit]) > Does the forked Firefox/Thunderbird installer also need this fix? Daniel, I guess it doesn't: <http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/find?string=%2Fsetup%2Fdialogs.c> {{ /toolkit/mozapps/installer/windows/wizard/setup/dialogs.c /xpinstall/wizard/os2/setup/dialogs.c /xpinstall/wizard/windows/setup/dialogs.c }} <http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/search?string=OldListBoxWndProc> {{ OldListBoxWndProc /toolkit/mozapps/installer/windows/wizard/setup/dialogs.c, line 80 -- static WNDPROC OldListBoxWndProc; /toolkit/mozapps/installer/windows/wizard/setup/dialogs.c, line 1217 -- return(CallWindowProc(OldListBoxWndProc, hWnd, uMsg, wParam, lParam)); /toolkit/mozapps/installer/windows/wizard/setup/dialogs.c, line 1269 -- OldListBoxWndProc = SubclassWindow(hwndLBComponents, (WNDPROC)NewListBoxWndProc); /xpinstall/wizard/os2/setup/dialogs.c, line 50 -- static PFNWP OldListBoxWndProc; /xpinstall/wizard/os2/setup/dialogs.c, line 1049 -- MRESULT mr = (OldListBoxWndProc)(hWnd, msg, mp1, mp2); /xpinstall/wizard/os2/setup/dialogs.c, line 1057 -- return(OldListBoxWndProc)(hWnd, msg, mp1, mp2); /xpinstall/wizard/os2/setup/dialogs.c, line 1132 -- OldListBoxWndProc = WinSubclassWindow(hwndLBComponents, (PFNWP)NewListBoxWndProc); /xpinstall/wizard/os2/setup/dialogs.c, line 1274 -- OldListBoxWndProc = WinSubclassWindow(hwndLBComponents, (PFNWP)NewListBoxWndProc); /xpinstall/wizard/windows/setup/dialogs.c, line 54 -- static WNDPROC OldListBoxWndProc; /xpinstall/wizard/windows/setup/dialogs.c, line 453 -- return(CallWindowProc(OldListBoxWndProc, hWnd, uMsg, wParam, lParam)); /xpinstall/wizard/windows/setup/dialogs.c, line 473 -- OldListBoxWndProc = SubclassWindow(hwndLBFolders, (WNDPROC)ListBoxBrowseWndProc); /xpinstall/wizard/windows/setup/dialogs.c, line 1335 -- return(CallWindowProc(OldListBoxWndProc, hWnd, uMsg, wParam, lParam)); /xpinstall/wizard/windows/setup/dialogs.c, line 1412 -- OldListBoxWndProc = SubclassWindow(hwndLBComponents, (WNDPROC)NewListBoxWndProc); /xpinstall/wizard/windows/setup/dialogs.c, line 1553 -- OldListBoxWndProc = SubclassWindow(hwndLBComponents, (WNDPROC)NewListBoxWndProc); }} *** Sean, I believe there are 2 possible further cleanups: <http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/search?string=wasMinimized> {{ wasMinimized /xpinstall/wizard/windows/setup/dialogs.c, line 2681 -- BOOL wasMinimized = FALSE; /xpinstall/wizard/windows/setup/dialogs.c, line 2709 -- wasMinimized = TRUE; /xpinstall/wizard/windows/setup/dialogs.c, line 2713 -- if(wasMinimized) /xpinstall/wizard/windows/setup/dialogs.c, line 2715 -- wasMinimized = FALSE; }} The current associated code seems useless !? {{ 2673 HWND hSTMessage = GetDlgItem(hDlg, IDC_MESSAGE); /* handle to the Static Text message window */ }} The var is unused ! I don't know if the function call must be kept or not ?
Updated•20 years ago
|
Target Milestone: mozilla1.8beta2 → ---
| Reporter | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → Seamonkey1.0alpha
Comment 30•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #27) > It doesn't have to have blocking status to get fixed What does it need to get fixed? Exact date of regression was found about half a year ago, bug was found about 10 weeks ago, and a fix made a week later, and r/sr done a week later. Now this crasher bug fix is waiting for a month to get checked in, what is needed? Does somebody have to apply for approval?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 31•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #30) > (In reply to comment #27) > > It doesn't have to have blocking status to get fixed > > What does it need to get fixed? (SeanS, DanielV) I would guess taking into account my answer and questions in comment 29 would be the next step. > Does somebody have to apply for approval? (NeilR) Maybe: I'm not sure how frozen (MAS ou "Core") this file is ?
Comment 32•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #31) > > What does it need to get fixed? > > (SeanS, DanielV) > I would guess taking into account my answer and questions in comment 29 would be > the next step. This bug is a crasher bug, probability to be seen very low, as it can be seen only at custom installation. > > Does somebody have to apply for approval? > > (NeilR) > Maybe: I'm not sure how frozen (MAS ou "Core") this file is ? You´ve been guessing in comment 29 that Firefox/Toolkit doesn´t need this, links supplied. You found some more nits to fix, but that won´t help the crash. As there are now changes for seamonkey going on I´ve got some fear this patch will bitrot, if not applied soon.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 33•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #32) > This bug is a crasher bug, probability to be seen very low, > as it can be seen only at custom installation. Sure. (but I don't understand why you wanted to write that in reply to my previous comment ?) > You found some more nits to fix, but that won´t help the crash. Sure. (these nits can be included to do one checkin only, or be dealt with in a second time as they are not mandatory at first.) > As there are now changes for seamonkey going on I´ve got some fear this patch > will bitrot, if not applied soon. I'm only the reporter here: it seems to be between Sean and Daniel, and possibly Neil...
Comment on attachment 175059 [details] [diff] [review] patch v1.1 [Checked in: Comment 37] Based on the comments, it looks like we do want to request approval for this.
Attachment #175059 -
Flags: approval1.8b2?
Comment 35•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 175059 [details] [diff] [review] patch v1.1 [Checked in: Comment 37] a=asa
Attachment #175059 -
Flags: approval1.8b2? → approval1.8b2+
| Reporter | ||
Comment 36•20 years ago
|
||
Sean, anyone: Checkin wanted !
Comment 37•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 175059 [details] [diff] [review] patch v1.1 [Checked in: Comment 37] 2005-05-05 09:08: mozilla/xpinstall/wizard/windows/setup/dialogs.c 1.95
Attachment #175059 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
| Reporter | ||
Comment 38•20 years ago
|
||
[Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050506] (nightly) (W98SE) R.Fixed
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [TimeFrame: See comment 2 and 3]
Updated•19 years ago
|
Attachment #174245 -
Attachment is obsolete: false
| Reporter | ||
Updated•19 years ago
|
Attachment #175059 -
Attachment description: patch v1.1 → patch v1.1
[Checked in: Comment 37]
| Reporter | ||
Comment 39•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #29) > > Sean, I believe there are 2 possible further cleanups: > > <http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/search?string=wasMinimized> > {{ > wasMinimized > /xpinstall/wizard/windows/setup/dialogs.c, line 2681 -- BOOL wasMinimized = FALSE; > /xpinstall/wizard/windows/setup/dialogs.c, line 2709 -- wasMinimized = TRUE; > /xpinstall/wizard/windows/setup/dialogs.c, line 2713 -- if(wasMinimized) > /xpinstall/wizard/windows/setup/dialogs.c, line 2715 -- wasMinimized = FALSE; > }} > The current associated code seems useless !? This variable was added by {{ 1.92 ssu%netscape.com 2004-07-07 17:47 fixing bug 47762 - Installer switches focus to itself repeatedly. r=leaf, sr=dveditz, a=asa }} but I wonder if/how it works. Sean, anyone: Could you answer my question(s) ? Thanks.
| Reporter | ||
Updated•19 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [SergeG: remaining followup "cleanup" issues in comments 21/29/39]
Comment 40•19 years ago
|
||
Serge: |wasMinimized| does have an effect: http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpinstall/wizard/windows/setup/dialogs.c#2730 2730 if(wasMinimized) 2731 { 2732 wasMinimized = FALSE; 2733 ResizeAndSetString(hDlg, lParam); 2734 }
| Reporter | ||
Comment 41•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #29) > {{ > 2673 HWND hSTMessage = GetDlgItem(hDlg, IDC_MESSAGE); /* handle to the > Static Text message window */ > }} > The var is unused ! I don't know if the function call must be kept or not ? The answer is "useless line": issue moved to bug 47762 comment 31.
Whiteboard: [SergeG: remaining followup "cleanup" issues in comments 21/29/39]
| Reporter | ||
Comment 42•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #40) > Serge: |wasMinimized| does have an effect: {{ (from emails between Andrew and me) > But I'm puzzled by > http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpinstall/wizard/windows/setup/dialogs.c#2698 > 2698 BOOL wasMinimized = FALSE; Oh, ok. [...] wasMinimized would need to be declared static (line ~58) to persist between calls to DlgProcMessage. But I don't know if that was Sean's intent or not. }} (Now we understand each other, but still miss Sean's insight :-/) I'll move this issue to bug 47762 too.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•