Closed
Bug 265404
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
some more crashes detected by mangler.cgi
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect)
Core
Layout
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla1.8alpha5
People
(Reporter: guninski, Assigned: dbaron)
References
Details
(Keywords: crash, fixed-aviary1.0, fixed1.7.5, Whiteboard: [patch])
Attachments
(4 files, 3 obsolete files)
146.95 KB,
text/html
|
Details | |
131.63 KB,
text/html
|
Details | |
4.96 KB,
text/html
|
Details | |
1.96 KB,
patch
|
bzbarsky
:
review+
brendan
:
superreview+
asa
:
approval-aviary+
asa
:
approval1.7.5+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040914 Firefox/0.10
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040914 Firefox/0.10
some more crashes generated by mangle.cgi.
tested on firefox 0.10. some of them don't work on mozilla 1.7.3
will attached them.
no debugged stack.
ma3.html - may be X bug, the stack seems fucked:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 1085497312 (LWP 9982)]
0x40436824 in gdk_window_impl_x11_get_type () from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
(gdb) info stack
#0 0x40436824 in gdk_window_impl_x11_get_type ()
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
Cannot access memory at address 0xbf7ffff8
(gdb) x/i $eip
0x40436824 <gdk_window_impl_x11_get_type+4>:
call 0x403f9023 <gdk_set_program_class+83>
(gdb)
ma4.html - eip == 0
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 1085497312 (LWP 10038)]
0x00000000 in ?? ()
(gdb) info stack
#0 0x00000000 in ?? ()
(gdb)
ma5.html - similar to ma3. the stack isn't very consistent. on first look like
infite recursion, not sure.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 1085497312 (LWP 10043)]
0x40436820 in gdk_window_impl_x11_get_type () from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
(gdb) info stack
#0 0x40436820 in gdk_window_impl_x11_get_type ()
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#1 0x4042b6db in _gdk_window_move_resize_child ()
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
(gdb) x/i $eip
0x40436820 <gdk_window_impl_x11_get_type>: push %ebx
ma6.html - like ma5.html
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
ma3.html
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
ma4.html
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
ma5.html
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
ma6.html
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
ma8.html works on both mozilla 1.7.3 and firefox 0.10.
the crash is in different locations, seems to be dependent on previous history.
several times crashed in free() after delete() which indicates there may be heap
overflow.
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
These need to be investigated and reduced to minimal cases, and probably split
into more than one bug. If you're not going to do it, would it be OK to remove
the confidential flag and see if we can get more help in on it?
Assignee: general → nobody
Blocks: Zalewski
Component: Browser-General → Layout
QA Contact: general → core.layout
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
of course i don't mind removing the security flag for this bug and/or splitting.
i believed it added some minimal protection.
i tried some of the testcases under valgrind, but then they didn't seem to crash.
probably "efence" may help for the heap ones.
will try to reduce them, but not sure.
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 162824 [details]
ma3.html
WFM now (most likely fixed by bug 264956).
Attachment #162824 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 11•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 162827 [details]
ma5.html
WFM now (most likely fixed by bug 264956).
Attachment #162827 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 12•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 162828 [details]
ma6.html
WFM now (most likely fixed by bug 264956).
Attachment #162828 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 13•20 years ago
|
||
ma4.html crashes (sometimes not on the first load) with the following on the
stack (aParentFrame looks dead):
dddddddd
nsCSSFrameConstructor::FindFrameWithContent(aPresContext=0x034f2798,
aFrameManager=0x036dec08, aParentFrame=0x03503c90, aParentContent=0x034b6928,
aContent=0x03771008, aHint=0x00000000) C++
nsCSSFrameConstructor::FindPrimaryFrameFor(aPresContext=0x034f2798,
aFrameManager=0x036dec08, aContent=0x03771008, aFrame=0x0012f234,
aHint=0x00000000) C++
nsFrameManager::GetPrimaryFrameFor(aContent=0x03771008) C++
PresShell::GetPrimaryFrameFor(aContent=0x03771008, aResult=0x0012f284) C++
nsCSSFrameConstructor::GetFrameFor(aPresShell=0x036debf0,
aPresContext=0x034f2798, aContent=0x03771008) C++
nsCSSFrameConstructor::ContentAppended(aPresContext=0x034f2798,
aContainer=0x03771008, aNewIndexInContainer=0) C++
and ma8 with this (mHead is 0x00000020, so this is dead):
nsFloatCacheList::~nsFloatCacheList() C++
nsLineBox::ExtraInlineData::~ExtraInlineData() C++
nsLineBox::ExtraInlineData::`scalar deleting destructor'() C++
nsLineBox::Cleanup() C++
nsLineBox::~nsLineBox() C++
nsLineBox::`scalar deleting destructor'() C++
nsLineBox::Destroy(aPresShell=0x033e40c0) C++
nsLineBox::DeleteLineList(aPresContext=0x0336fd58, aLines={...}) C++
DestroyOverflowLines(aPresContext=0x0336fd58, aFrame=0x0321bff0,
aPropertyName=0x003efe60, aPropertyValue=0x0336f5d8) C++
nsFrameManager::SetFrameProperty(aFrame=0x0321bff0, aPropertyName=0x003efe60,
aPropertyValue=0x031b1868, aPropDtorFunc=0x01899dc0) C++
nsFrame::SetProperty(aPresContext=0x0336fd58, aPropName=0x003efe60,
aPropValue=0x031b1868, aPropDtorFunc=0x01899dc0) C++
nsBlockFrame::SetOverflowLines(aPresContext=0x0336fd58,
aOverflowLines=0x031b1868) C++
nsBlockFrame::PushLines(aState={...}, aLineBefore={...}) C++
nsBlockFrame::PlaceLine(aState={...}, aLineLayout={...}, aLine={...},
aKeepReflowGoing=0x0012841c, aUpdateMaximumWidth=0) C++
nsBlockFrame::DoReflowInlineFrames(aState={...}, aLineLayout={...}, aLine={...},
aKeepReflowGoing=0x0012841c, aLineReflowStatus=0x001281af,
aUpdateMaximumWidth=0, aDamageDirtyArea=1) C++
nsBlockFrame::DoReflowInlineFramesAuto(aState={...}, aLine={...},
aKeepReflowGoing=0x0012841c, aLineReflowStatus=0x001281af,
aUpdateMaximumWidth=0, aDamageDirtyArea=1) C++
...
Over to dbaron...
Assignee: nobody → dbaron
Flags: blocking-aviary1.0?
OS: Linux → All
Hardware: PC → All
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•20 years ago
|
||
The latter stack (ma8) in comment 13 looks like bug 265027. (We shouldn't call
PushLines in non-paginated layout.)
Updated•20 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•20 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 163086 [details] [diff] [review]
patch for ma4
I said I'd do this the next time I saw one of these crashes, and I am.
Attachment #163086 -
Flags: superreview?(brendan)
Attachment #163086 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #163086 -
Flags: approval1.7.x?
Attachment #163086 -
Flags: approval-aviary?
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [patch]
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.8alpha5
Comment 17•20 years ago
|
||
Attachment #163086 -
Flags: superreview?(brendan) → superreview+
Comment 18•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 163086 [details] [diff] [review]
patch for ma4
a=asa for branch checkins.
Attachment #163086 -
Flags: approval1.7.x?
Attachment #163086 -
Flags: approval1.7.x+
Attachment #163086 -
Flags: approval-aviary?
Attachment #163086 -
Flags: approval-aviary+
Comment 19•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 163086 [details] [diff] [review]
patch for ma4
r=bzbarsky. Those are a pain to track down, indeed....
Attachment #163086 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•20 years ago
|
||
Fix checked in to trunk, 2004-10-22 19:49 -0700.
Fix checked in to AVIARY_1_0_20040515_BRANCH, 2004-10-22 19:50 -0700.
Fix checked in to MOZILLA_1_7_BRANCH, 2004-10-22 19:50 -0700.
(I'm tempted to mark the bug invalid, though, since filing many bugs in one
report makes things almost impossible to track.)
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Keywords: fixed-aviary1.0,
fixed1.7.x
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•20 years ago
|
Flags: blocking-aviary1.0?
Comment 21•20 years ago
|
||
clearing security flag
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•