Closed
Bug 266416
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
acrobat plugin obviously loads but does not display anything with mozilla 1.8a3 and 1.8a4
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: Plug-ins, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 246560
People
(Reporter: jochen, Unassigned)
References
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8a4) Gecko/20041027 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8a4) Gecko/20041027 Since mozilla 1.8a3 the acrobat plugin does not work anymore. When opening a pdf file, the plugin loads (i.e. the adobe splash screen is shown), however nothing is displayed, not even the acrobat reader controls, just an empty, white page. there's no extra cpu activity or something strange, the browser is also still working. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
For me it's the same. I can't remember that it ever worked with any 1.8 version.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
* Does acrobat work on its own? (i.e. can you save the PDF to disk, and then view it with acrobat. * Is this true for all PDFs? (I've seen this problem for cases where the PDF file has newer features not supported by an older plugin ) * does it work if you de/re-install acrobat? * does it work if you install a newer version of acrobat?
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
1. acroread does work standalone without problems 2. every PDF I ever tried to open failed 3. reinstallation doesn't help 4. I have tried 5.0.9 (latest) and 5.0.8
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
* Does acrobat work on its own? (i.e. can you save the PDF to disk, and then view it with acrobat. yes, perfectly * Is this true for all PDFs? (I've seen this problem for cases where the PDF file has newer features not supported by an older plugin ) yes, doesn't work for a single pdf * does it work if you de/re-install acrobat? no, done this until my finger bleeded * does it work if you install a newer version of acrobat? tried three different versions, including latest, doesn't work on any
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
Do any messages appear in console when loading the plugin (assuming Mozilla is started from there)? Also you might want to figure out when this regressed exactly with the help of the builds from http://archive.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/ (Note: Mozilla 1.8a3 was released around 2004-08-18, so test a few weeks before and so narrow down the regression window).
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
when loading a pdf I get the following messages: Warning: Actions not found: addBookmark, viewBookmark, copy, undefined-key, find, findAgain, history, loadImages, openURL, mailNew, new, openFile, print, exit, reload, saveAs, paste, delete, cut, undo, historyItem, back, forward, abort, PageUp, PageDown Warning: Actions not found: ManagerGadgetNextTabGroup, ManagerGadgetPrevTabGroup, DrawingAreaInput, addBookmark, viewBookmark, copy, undefined-key, find, findAgain, history, loadImages, openURL, mailNew, new, openFile, print, exit, reload, saveAs, paste, delete, cut, undo, historyItem, back, forward, abort, PageUp, PageDown Warning: No action proc named "ManagerGadgetArm" is registered for widget "form" Document http://c0ffee.org/stuff/juhe-gmd.pdf loaded successfully when clicking the part of the window, where the page should be displayed, i get (per click): Warning: No action proc named "ManagerGadgetArm" is registered for widget "form" the regression search will take a while...
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
maybe i'm sitting far to long in front of my pee cee today, but somehow most directories in this archive are empty?
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
2004-08-05-12-trunk works fine 2004-08-05-23-trunk does not work (could somebody remove the empty directories from archive.mozilla.org? it's really a pain to find the few .tar.gzs in there...)
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
Thanks for testing! Here is the Bonsai link: http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=default&module=SeaMonkeyAll&branch=HEAD&branchtype=match&dir=&file=&filetype=match&who=&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=2&date=explicit&mindate=2004-08-05+11%3A00%3A00&maxdate=2004-08-05+23%3A00%3A00&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot Now the question is, what checkin caused this. I don't see any highly suspicious checkin there, maybe someone else can look into this...
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
i've just checked out the 2004-08-05 11:00 snapshot and will compile that now... i'll try to apply every single patch then, so we'll see which one breaks it
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•20 years ago
|
||
Ok, I did the following to get the sources cvs co mozilla/client.mk cd mozilla make -f client.mk MOZ_CO_DATE="2004-08-05 11:00" checkout however, the patch produced by bonsai does not apply cleanly to this source tree, and after compiling, the result mozilla can't display .pdfs correctly. So I guess I'm doing something wrong there... could somebody help me, and provide me with instructions on how to get the sources used to compiled 2004-08-05-12-trunk?
Comment 12•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #11) > Ok, I did the following to get the sources > > cvs co mozilla/client.mk > cd mozilla > make -f client.mk MOZ_CO_DATE="2004-08-05 11:00" checkout I don't know if yours works, too but i would do this: cvs -co -D "2004-08-05 11:00" mozilla/client.mk cd mozilla add mk_add_options MOZ_CO_DATE="2004-08-05 11:00" to your .mozconfig. make -f client.mk checkout make -f client.mk build Look if it works cd .. cvs update -j3.270 -j3.271 mozilla/layout/base/src/nsPresContext.cpp (this is one checkin which could have caused this). cd mozilla/layout/base/src make cd ../../build make Look if it works report back :)
Reporter | ||
Comment 13•20 years ago
|
||
ok, I checked out & compiled mozilla as you've suggested, and... nothing, doesn't work. So I've downloaded 2004-08-05-12-trunk (http://archive.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/2004-08-05-12-trunk/mozilla-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.gz) again and checked... works strange enough, this 2004-08-05-12-trunk has build id 2004080510, however betwen 10 o'clock and 11 there were no checkins I really wonder which sources were used to build this strange 2004-08-05-12-trunk
Comment 14•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #13) > ok, I checked out & compiled mozilla as you've suggested, and... nothing, > doesn't work. Ok, so it doesn't work with and without the checkin into mozilla/layout/base/src/nsPresContext.cpp? To be honest, i don't understand this then. Did you add ac_add_options --enable-default-toolkit=gtk2 and ac_add_options --enable-xft to your .mozconfig (since the builds from -12 use gtk2 and xft)? Maybe yours is a gtk(1) only bug?
Reporter | ||
Comment 15•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #14) > Ok, so it doesn't work with and without the checkin into > mozilla/layout/base/src/nsPresContext.cpp? I just checked whether it works _without_ the checkin (it doesn't) > To be honest, i don't understand this > then. Did you add ac_add_options --enable-default-toolkit=gtk2 and > ac_add_options --enable-xft to your .mozconfig (since the builds from -12 use > gtk2 and xft)? Maybe yours is a gtk(1) only bug? I had gtk2 enabled, but not xft. I'm rebuilding with xft support now... will report back in ~6h
Comment 16•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #15) > I had gtk2 enabled, but not xft. I'm rebuilding with xft support now... will > report back in ~6h Sorry, forgot to tell you that :/, xft is now enabled by default when gtk2 is enabled since a few month
Comment 17•20 years ago
|
||
btw, the official .mozconfig from the nightly builds looks like this: export MOZILLA_OFFICIAL=1 mk_add_options MOZILLA_OFFICIAL=1 export BUILD_OFFICIAL=1 mk_add_options BUILD_OFFICIAL=1 ac_add_options --disable-tests ac_add_options --enable-extensions=default,irc,tasks,negotiateauth ac_add_options --without-system-nspr ac_add_options --without-system-jpeg ac_add_options --without-system-zlib ac_add_options --without-system-png ac_add_options --without-system-mng ac_add_options --disable-debug ac_add_options --enable-optimize="-O2 -gstabs+" ac_add_options --enable-crypto # GTK2+Xft ac_add_options --enable-default-toolkit=gtk2 ac_add_options --enable-xft MOZ_ENABLE_COREXFONTS= ac_add_options --disable-freetype2 ac_add_options --disable-xprint
Reporter | ||
Comment 18•20 years ago
|
||
hi, compiled with xft enabled, still doesn't work. I'll compile with the official mozconfig options now... cu in 6h
Reporter | ||
Comment 19•20 years ago
|
||
compiled again, doesn't work again. i'll try two things now: a) checkout a version from 2004-08-01 b) compile with gcc-3.3 instead of gcc-3.4 let's see which of those two will lead to success
Reporter | ||
Comment 20•20 years ago
|
||
still doesn't work :( I'm running out of ideas what I could try next... any suggestions?
Reporter | ||
Comment 21•20 years ago
|
||
could it possibly be a subtle change in the tool-chain used to compile? maybe all my builds won't work since i'm always using the same toolchain
Reporter | ||
Comment 22•20 years ago
|
||
aha :-) mozilla-2004-08-05-12-trunk was compiled with gcc-3.2.3 mozilla-2004-08-05-23-trunk was compiled with gcc-3.3.4 i'm compiling with gcc-3.4.2 and gcc-3.3.4 so I guess it's a problem with the abi changes between gcc-3.2 and gcc-3.3
Comment 23•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 272648 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 24•20 years ago
|
||
I have exactly the same problem with Windows XP. I am currently using build 2005011204. The plugin worked with nightly builds back in November, I think.
Updated•19 years ago
|
Flags: blocking-aviary2.0?
Comment 25•19 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 246560 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Flags: blocking-aviary2.0?
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 26•19 years ago
|
||
I wonder if this bug here still exists in this way, comet still says "Compiler is -- gcc (gcc (GCC) 3.2.3". Maybe we just used the wrong builds from another tinderbox to find the regression range...?
Comment 27•19 years ago
|
||
comet compiles gtk1 builds with gcc 3.2.3 lhasa compiles gtk2 builds with gcc 3.3.4 It is only gtk2 builds that are affected by the bug. Jochen: are you sure your 2004-08-05-12-trunk build is gtk2
Updated•2 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•