Closed
Bug 266564
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
No need to include XPCOM.DLL in the Gecko SDK
Categories
(Core :: XPCOM, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla1.8beta1
People
(Reporter: darin.moz, Assigned: darin.moz)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
|
895 bytes,
patch
|
benjamin
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
There's no need to include XPCOM.DLL in the Gecko SDK. Developers should get XPCOM.DLL from the GRE or from a Mozilla release. The Gecko SDK does not include a runtime. It is more like a -devel RPM package. (Hey, maybe we should make one of those?)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #163763 -
Flags: review?(bsmedberg)
| Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.8beta
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #163763 -
Flags: review?(bsmedberg) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
fixed-on-trunk
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
I was hoping people could just grab one archive and have both the import libraries they need to build their product|component as well as the libraries needed in order to ship independently of a browser.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
Right, that would be nice, but most of the runtime is missing from the current Gecko SDK. It seems that we already output the GRE into dist/gre, so we should maybe just be packaging that. I could see us including that in the SDK at some point or provide it as a separate download. Right now my aim is to take the shortest steps necessary to just get something for people who have installed Mozilla and want to develop components or embed it.
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
i understand. xpcom should have its own distribution if people actually want xpcom outside of the gecko.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•