Closed
Bug 266652
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Plugins are not clipped and rendered over iframes.
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: Plug-ins, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: bora123, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(3 files)
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Build Identifier: All versions Plugins are not clipped by the absolutely positioned iframes with higher z- index. They stay on top of iframes. On Solaris, they always stays at the bottom meaning if the iframe that plugin is in has a higher zindex than another iframe below with lower ZIndex. Plugin stays at the bottom completely hidden. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Use the test cases 2. 3. Expected Results: Plugins must respect the iframe geometries and style properties. This has ruined our entire mozilla based product since the mozilla 1.3.1. the money we lost is irrecoverable. If the firefox is going to go gold with this bug in the it will be very damaging for compaines having this problem in front of them. We were thinking about not supporting mozilla at all but it doesnt solve the problem we had and having. I am sure the fix must be very straightforward for someone who knows the Mozilla source base well. regards,
Summary: Plugins are not clipped and rendered out of iframes. → Plugins are not clipped and rendered over iframes.
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
Related: Bug 133968 (probably it's even the same?, but let's stick here, since there's too much trash in the other bug)
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
-->invalid set wmode="transparent" for the flash example and it will work.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
To clarify, plugins typically paint themselves directly to the graphics context, bypassing the browser's drawing routines altogether, so they'll end up on top of everything else. Some plugins (flash, notably) support "windowless" operation that allows them to participate in the browser's compositing pipeline (so allows things to overlap them, for example; in this mode, the plugin and browser cooperate to ensure that the plugin is correctly composited with the other content the browser is rendering.). To enable windowless operation for Flash, the "wmode" attribute of the embed or "wmode" param of the object needs to be set to "transparent".
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
How this is invalid when the Test case 1 and 3 is not demonstrating good will with wmode="transparent"? Boris, Iframes should nor work as DIVs. They should clip anything including plugins because for example their contents can be two different web sites. When you overlap these two iframes with different sites, regardless what the wmode of the plugins they include they should not dissolve in each other.
Status: VERIFIED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: INVALID → ---
CC'ing Peter, I really would like to know what he thinks on this.
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
> How this is invalid when the Test case 1 and 3 is not demonstrating good will > with wmode="transparent"? Because wmode="transparent" is a Flash command (as in, it's just passed on to the Flash plugin, and the plugin decides what to do with it) and those are Java applets. The Java plugin can go windowless too, as I recall; check the Java plugin documentation on how that's done. > Boris, Iframes should nor work as DIVs. They should clip anything including > plugins Actually, that's wrong. Iframes can be translucent, in particular, with the content they're on top of shining through them. At some point Robert did some work to make it possible to do that; that's probably what "broke" your testcases. Again, this is invalid. There is just no way to make plugins that are not windowless be part of the standard browser rendering pipeline.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago → 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
If something is broken (clearly it is) why this is marked "invalid" instead of directing it to the right person? I think it should remain open until it is totally cleared out. Plus my intend on reporting this bug was not about problems with windowless plugins or problems with translucent iframes. All I have two iframes (not translucent) and my java applet (does not have windowless mode) does not play right on my testcase 1 and testcase 3. The test case 2 having the flash example I think it is confusing it all. Test case 3 demonstrates the problem in a more elaborative point of view with framesets in iframes working right but iframes themselves do not. I would like to reopen it until Robert takes a look at it.
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: INVALID → ---
Comment 11•20 years ago
|
||
> If something is broken (clearly it is) No, the point is nothing is broken. Things are working exactly as specified. > and my java applet (does not have windowless mode) That's a bug in your java applet, then. The framesets issue sounds like a bug in Mozilla's frameset implementation... Since you insist on having this open, feel free to, but I doubt that will change anything materially.
Whiteboard: INVALID
I haven't looked at the testcases --- it'd be helpful if you make a testcase available either on your own Website or preferably as a set of Bugzilla attachments so I can just click on it. It sounds like the problem is that you have an IFRAME and a Java applet and the IFRAME has higher z-index but the Java applet is drawn on top. Correct? Boris is correct that we do not attempt to make plugins work well with z-index. It's just not possible in general. This workaround might work: wrap the IFRAME and the Java applet in DIVs, and set the z-index on the DIVs, and make the DIVs overflow:auto.
Reporter | ||
Comment 13•20 years ago
|
||
Hi Robert, I will make the testcases as bugzilla attachments first thing tomorrow. I will try the workaround you have suggested. The problem started right after Mozilla 1.3.1. It was working just fine before. Testcase 3 demonstrates the problem well. The frameset in Iframe can clip the java applet just fine. But the iframe itself cant. I will put out the bugzilla attachments rightaway. best regards,
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•20 years ago
|
||
I am trying to figure out how to make a bugzilla attacment, In the mean time,
let me clearify the problem I am having.
>It sounds like the problem is that you have an IFRAME and a Java applet and the
>IFRAME has higher z-index but the Java applet is drawn on top. Correct?
Applet is in the content of IFRAME.
From test case 1:
this is the code for test.htm
<html>
<body>
<iframe width="300" height="300" style="position:absolute;z-
index:10;top:20;left:20" src='m1.htm'></iframe>
<iframe width="300" height="300" style="position:absolute;z-
index:20;top:60;left:60" src='m.htm'></iframe>
</body>
</html>
-------------------------------------->8
code for m.htm
<html>
<body bgcolor="#0000FF">
</body>
</html>
-------------------------------------->8
code for m1.htm
<html>
<body>
<applet code="Clock" width=70 height=70></applet>
</body>
</html>
Applet is a very simple clock. The applet in the iframe with "src" set to
m1.htm always pops up in front of the iframe with "src" set to m.htm. It should
remain clipped under the iframe with higher zindex. This was working fine last
in Mozilla 1.3.1.
Making those IFRAMEs position:fixed might make the problem go away too.
Boris, we could probably do some work to try to get the widget z-order to match the CSS z-order better. E.g., order the widgets based on where their views appear in the display list. It wouldn't be perfect of course, in particular plugins would still render on top of content whose nearest widget was the root widget, but it would help these testcases.
Reporter | ||
Comment 17•20 years ago
|
||
Robert, I have tried position:fixed. It had no effect. In the mean time, I was unable to find a way to create bugzilla attachments :\. It works for a split second when mouse clicked onto one of the iframes(test case 1). I think Boris removed himself from the CC list.
Reporter | ||
Comment 18•20 years ago
|
||
I have put the testcases to the following URL http://www.geocities.com/bora123/
Whiteboard: INVALID
Reporter | ||
Comment 19•20 years ago
|
||
Although this fix was done for MacOs, It might have broken something. http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsview2.cgi? diff_mode=context&whitespace_mode=show&file=nsObjectFrame.cpp&branch=&root=/cvsr oot&subdir=mozilla/layout/html/base/src&command=DIFF_FRAMESET&rev1=1.379&rev2=1. 380 fix was made for bug#191821
Reporter | ||
Comment 20•20 years ago
|
||
Robert, In nsObjectFrame.cpp from revision from 1.379 to 1.380 in the function nsPluginPort* nsPluginInstanceOwner::FixUpPluginWindow() there are suspicous changes regarding the clipping view ObjectFrame. http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsview2.cgi?command=DIFF&subdir=mozilla%2Flayout% 2Fhtml%2Fbase% 2Fsrc&file=nsObjectFrame.cpp&rev1=1.379&rev2=1.380&whitespace_mode=show&diff_mod e=full
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago → 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Comment 21•19 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 303636 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 22•19 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 227470 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Updated•2 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•