Closed
Bug 267570
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
network.protocol-handler.external.shell vulnerability still in Firefox 1.01PR
Categories
(Firefox Build System :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: zero_one010101, Assigned: bryner)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: qawanted)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041001 Firefox/0.10.1 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041001 Firefox/0.10.1 bcheck.scanit.be/bcheck/ performs a test in your broswer for vulnerabilities. The site performs 7 different tests on Mozilla browsers. I have the lastest version of Mozilla Firefox (1.10.1) and the test results still detect the vulnerbility of the Mozilla windows shell: external protocol handler. That bug suposed to be fixed in Mozilla Firefox 9.2. However my browser seems to still being vulnerable. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Enter the site http://bcheck.scanit.be/bcheck/ 2. 3. Actual Results: The test results finds a medium risk vulnerability (moz250180). Expected Results: As I have the lastest version of Firefox, that vulnerabuilty should be already fixed. Im using 'Qute 2.1.3' theme. I have the following extensions installed: DOM Inspector 1.0 mozImage 0.10.0 Bandwidth Tester 0.4 Compact Menu 1.7.1.1 BugMeNot 0.6 Download Manager Tweak 0.6.2 ieview 0.84
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 267568 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
WFM with FF 1.0RC2/0.12. Not with Moz 1.8a5 but only because the test is not ok, I guess it tests only if I can open a window with shell. Mozilla does open a window and displays an error (unknown protocol). So the tests display failed although Moz is no vulnerable. FF does not open any extra window.
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
WFM Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041030 Firefox/1.0RC2. I used http://bcheck.scanit.be/bcheck/choosetests.php and only checked "moz250180". Does upgrading to RC2 help? When the site says "test failed", what else happens (error messages, Media player window appearing, etc)?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
Well, even after the big release of Firefox 1.0, my browser is still vulnerable. I performed the test again. Answering the Jesse Ruderman's question, nothing happens, no new windows or open programs, but my broser fails the test. When iI uninstalled Firefox 1.01.1 PR, I also deleted the entire folder, but when i Installed Firefox 1.0, the program reminded the my custom preferences and extensions. Where can I delete that, maybe the problem is there.
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
The test on the site could be incorrect. Can you make a minimal testcase and attach it here?
Keywords: qawanted
| Reporter | ||
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
I'm very sorry, I don't know what you mean with "minimal testcase". Can you explain it to me?
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
A very small page that demonstrates the problem, probably based on the page you linked to. http://www.mozilla.org/newlayout/bugathon.html
| Reporter | ||
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
You know, for some reason, the site never detects if i have javascript enabled, but it performs the scan anyway. I think it must be, as you say "Evangelised"! But I dont mind. I guess that's all. Thanks everyone for your support.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Updated•6 years ago
|
Component: Build Config → General
Product: Firefox → Firefox Build System
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•