Open Bug 268159 Opened 21 years ago Updated 3 years ago

Certain replies appear to have no formatting but are not auto-converted to plain text (for "unknown" recipients)

Categories

(MailNews Core :: Composition, defect)

defect

Tracking

(Not tracked)

People

(Reporter: mfedyk, Unassigned)

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 Firefox/0.10.1 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 Firefox/0.10.1 I have this option set: tools -> optoins -> composition -> send options -> send the message as both plain text and html And this is set also: tools -> account settings -> composition & addressing -> compose message in html format I have a message that I received that was plain text, and replied to it and didn't use any formatting, except for the automatic colored vertical quoting lines. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Reply to plain text message 2. Do not make use any formatting (bold, larger text, etc) 3. Send Actual Results: Outgoing message is in plain text & html. Expected Results: Outgoing message should only be in plain text.
Forgot to put build ID: TB 0.9 (20041103)
What is the mail-type preference for the recipient in your address book? Plain, HTML, or Unknown? For a recipient with an unknown preference, the actual results are expected.
I never set those in the address book, and I think this message created a new card for this person -- so it must be unknown. Just checked the card, and it is "unknown". So, now I have to set each card on who wants plain text and who wants html? Why does the blue vertical quote line have to count as formatting?
(In reply to comment #3) > So, now I have to set each card on who wants plain text and who wants html? Afraid so; it is kind of a pain. See bug 44494. > Why does the blue vertical quote line have to count as formatting? Y'know, I didn't read your bug report carefully enough -- that shouldn't count as formatting. And when I just tried a simple test, it didn't -- my default option is "Ask me what to do" and replying in HTML to my "unknown" recipient did not generate the prompt. However, when I replied to a text/plain (non-format=flowed) message with multiple levels of quotes, like the original message in your attachment, I *did* get the HTML Mail Question. That makes a combination of nested <blockquote>s and <pre> text, which may be sufficiently complex to prevent automatic conversion to plain text. A f=f, multiple-level-quote reply is silently converted to plain, and so is a non-f=f, single-level-quote reply, However: a reply to an HTML mail, even a very simple one with no quotes, results in the HTML Mail Question appearing. In my simple test case, the HTML which was not auto-converted looked like this: <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> M Cowperthwaite wrote: <blockquote cite="mid3F785663.4040208@toast.net" type="cite"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;"> <title></title> Just some plain text.<br> </blockquote> Perfect!<br> </body> Maybe the <meta> or <title> tag that were (invalidly) included in the reply's <blockquote> was sufficient to trigger the "this message is formatted" flag. I see these results in TB 0.9 and Moz 1.8a5-1019, Win2K. Moving bug to MailNews.
Severity: enhancement → minor
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: Message Compose Window → Composition
Ever confirmed: true
Product: Thunderbird → MailNews
Summary: If replying to plain text message and mode is "send as plain text & HTML" and there is no formatting then only send as plain text → Certain replies appear to have no formatting but are not auto-converted to plain text (for "unknown" recipients)
Version: unspecified → Trunk
Product: MailNews → Core
Assignee: mscott → nobody
QA Contact: composition
Product: Core → MailNews Core
Severity: minor → S4
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: