Open Bug 268206 Opened 20 years ago Updated 2 years ago

Evil code which violates xpcom rules and will break eventually

Categories

(Core :: XUL, defect, P5)

Product:
Core
Component:
XUL
Platform:
x86
Windows XP
Type:
defect

Tracking

()

People

(Reporter: timeless, Unassigned)

References

(
URL
)

Details

The comment claims it's 'ok', but if the object ever had the interface
implemented as a tearoff or happened to be proxied, then it wouldn't be ok.
ccing author of that code.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Priority: -- → P5
Assignee: jag → nobody
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.