Closed
Bug 268734
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
Suggestion: change the defaults for IMAP settings to something more user-friendly than network-friendly
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Mail Window Front End, enhancement)
Thunderbird
Mail Window Front End
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INCOMPLETE
People
(Reporter: jhaar, Assigned: mscott)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041103 Firefox/1.0RC2 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041103 Firefox/1.0RC2 Hi there I just started using Thunderbird some days ago, and I must say this is the first time I've been attracted away from mutt in 8 years! Well done. Anyway, I have some UI issues with IMAP that I'd like to expound - on the off-chance you agree with me :-) I think *most users* would prefer it that when they configure a new IMAP account profile, that: a> all folders be marked as subscribed by default b> all folders be checked for new messages c> timeouts/IMAP/network failures don't result in a formal popup-and-block-until-you-click-to-clear-and-retry I know a and b are heavier on the IMAP server, but this is a GUI for *users* - not Network Managers (and I'm a network manager!). All I know is that the very first thing I do when I enter a new IMAP client is go and configure the above, and every time I'm near a normal user when they are configuring a IMAP profile, I hear "hey - where are all my mail folders gone? IT'S DELETED THEM!?!?!?". I just think the defaults should be more user friendly - someone concerned about performance could always go in and change back to a less intensive mode. I think Microsoft Outlook 2003 (in MAPI mode) has it right: the default is to show all folders, monitor all for new messages, and synchronise mail in the background, with any network glitches/etc being subtly reported to the user via some tiny scrolling thingy. Outlook 2003 goes one step further and synchronizes all folders to local disk - a step I'd be reluctant to say for Thunderbird given the size of my mailbox ;-) Anyway, just wanted to share Keep up the good work Jason Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more reproduction information if you have it. If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. Thank you for your help in this matter. The latest beta releases can be obtained from: Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
Comment 2•19 years ago
|
||
(I'm not the person who originally reported the bug, but I am the one person who's voted for it.) I've just set up a new account, and it appears that all folders were automatically subscribed, so that's point a, and the biggest point. Point B is still an issue, though less important than point a. Point C is also still an issue, very much so for me as I access my work email through a flaky VPN connection; I'd really like background synchronization, non-intrusive error messages, and automatic online/offline detection and mode switching.
Updated•18 years ago
|
QA Contact: front-end
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
This should be divide for three separate bugs which already exist in bugzilla
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•