Closed
Bug 268993
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
rowspan attribute in emial table creation results in too many columns <TD>
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Message Compose Window, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: Mike.Gross, Assigned: mscott)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707 When creating an HTML email with a table, "rowspan" (Cell, Advanced Edit) must remove one column (<TD> </TD>) from the rows it is spanning into. It currently leaves all columns in that row and causes a "bump out" on the right side of the table. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Compose new HTML message. 2. Insert table (default 2x2 is fine). 3. With the cursor in top, left table cell, open Table Cell Properties dialog. 4. Select "Advanced Edit..." 5. Add new attribute "rowspan" with value of 2. Select OK, OK. Actual Results: Table now has three columns, instead of two. Expected Results: Second row of table should have only had one <TD> </TD> set since one of the first row's <TD> </TD> spanned into second row. Does not matter which column has the rowspan. Bug confuses Table's properties. Table properties now reports a 2x3 table, but when trying to change value back to 2x2, nothing happens.
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
It isn't clear to me that this is a bug. If you had already entered data into the various TD's, then changed a cell to add the rowspan, would you really want that TD's data to be thrown away? What if the rowspan had been erroneous? Whereas, it's a simple matter to right-click the extraneous cell, and select: Table Delete | Cell(s)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1) > It isn't clear to me that this is a bug. If you had already entered data into > the various TD's, then changed a cell to add the rowspan, would you really want > that TD's data to be thrown away? What if the rowspan had been erroneous? > > Whereas, it's a simple matter to right-click the extraneous cell, and select: > Table Delete | Cell(s) OK... I didn't see the Delete Cell(s) in the top menu bar. I assumed that it would have been in the popup menu (when right-clicking) or popup dialog window (when double-clicking). Although an alternative to throwing the cell away or shifting the row over would be to concatenate text in the spanned cells. I guess this would be more of an enhancement than bug.
Severity: normal → minor
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2) >(In reply to comment #1) >> it's a simple matter to right-click the extraneous cell, and select: >> Table Delete | Cell(s) > [...] > I assumed that it would have been in the popup menu (when right-clicking) Which I thought it was -- but on retesting, I see that this is not part of the context menu in TB's HTML editor; instead, it's part of Moz Composer and NVU. In TB, it is necessary to use (as you've discovered) Format | Table | Delete | Table Cell(s) > or popup dialog window (when double-clicking). Properties dialogs do not (should not!) provide a means to delete the object whose properties are being edited. On playing with this a little more, I see that the little cell-widgets work badly when the cell (or column or row) exists while missing a naboring cell -- ideally, you'd be able to click on that little (x) above the cell to delete it (deleting the column, actually), but nothing happens. That behavior is the same in Composer, so should be filed against Browser|Editor:Composer. > Although an alternative to throwing the cell away or shifting the row over > would be to concatenate text in the spanned cells. > I guess this would be more of an enhancement than bug. In my opinion, that would be more of an annoyance than an enhancement.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3) > On playing with this a little more, I see that the little cell-widgets work > badly when the cell (or column or row) exists while missing a naboring cell Opened bug 270438 for this.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•