Closed
Bug 269890
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
URN Support
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: Tracking, enhancement)
Core Graveyard
Tracking
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: blakesley, Assigned: chofmann)
References
Details
(Keywords: meta)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-GB; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041110 Firefox/1.0 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-GB; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041110 Firefox/1.0 This a request for URN <http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2141.txt> support and a meta-bug for request for particular URN schemes <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces>. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
| Reporter | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
To clarify, this is a general meta-bug as opposed to one for specific back-end support for the URN URI scheme--there may need to be a seperate bug for that.
Updated•20 years ago
|
Assignee: darin → chofmann
Component: Networking → Tracking
QA Contact: benc → chofmann
Updated•19 years ago
|
Updated•19 years ago
|
Summary: RFE: URN Support → URN Support
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
Yeah, general URN support would be quite important. At the moment, it's quite easy to add new URI scheme and protocol handlers to Firefox (which is often a "don't do" in the official guidelines of the w3c) but, in the absence of a base URN scheme handler, it's essentially impossible to add new URN namespaces without being sure that they will eventually conflict.
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
I wish to add that this is a big problem for OpenBerg Lector. At the moment, we're using a "library" scheme, but, well, by doing so, we're going against the W3C's recommendations. So we feel bad about it.
Updated•8 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Updated•8 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•