Closed
Bug 271098
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
navigator.javaEnabled returns false if browser is started with java enabled
Categories
(Firefox :: General, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 221080
People
(Reporter: firefox, Assigned: bugzilla)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
507 bytes,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0 The navigator.javaEnabled javascript function will return false when the browser is started with java enabled. If java is then disabled and re-enabled, the function correctly returns true. Here is a small html document that can be used to reproduce the problem. <html> <head> <title>Java Check</title> <script language="JavaScript"> function submitForm() { if (navigator.javaEnabled()){ } else{ alert("Sorry, your browser doesn't support Java."); return; } document.userForm.submit(); } </script> </head> <body> <form name="userForm" action="" method="post" target="_self"> <table> <tr> <td align="left" nowrap>Customer ID:</td> <td align="left"> <input type="text" value="" name="user" maxlength="32"> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan=2 align=center> <input type="button" value="Enter" onclick="submitForm();"> </td> </tr> </table> </form> </body> </html> Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Enable java in the browser 2. Quit the browser 3. Restart the browser 4. Load the sample document described in the Details section of the bug report 5. Enter some text and click "Enter" (java not enbled alert pops up). 6. Disable java in the browser 7. Re-enable java in the browser 8. Reload the web page 9. Enter some text and click "Enter" (no alert pops up - correct behavior) Actual Results: navigator.javaEnabled does not work until java is disabled and then re-enabled. Expected Results: navigator.javaEnabled should correctly report the java enabled/disabled state after a browser restart.
This doesn't fix the underlying problem, but seems to work around it. I don't know enough about the inner workings of firefox, but it looks to me like user_pref("security.enable_java", false); is (correctly) set when java is disabled, but that line is (incorrectly?) missing when java is enabled. The test for JavaEnabled appears to return false if that line is missing. Is it possible that a line should be written into prefs.js explicitly enabling java? For example: user_pref("security.enable_java", true);
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more reproduction information if you have it. If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. Thank you for your help in this matter. The latest beta releases can be obtained from: Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
This bug has been automatically resolved after a period of inactivity (see above comment). If anyone thinks this is incorrect, they should feel free to reopen it.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → EXPIRED
Updated•19 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: EXPIRED → ---
Comment 5•19 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 221080 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago → 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•