Closed
Bug 271305
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
publishing event deletes calendar
Categories
(Calendar :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 218983
People
(Reporter: urthe1neo, Assigned: mostafah)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/0.10.1 StumbleUpon/1.998 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a5) Gecko/20041112 Mozilla Sunbird/0.2b when publishing a single event to a file for a calendar, all other events are deleted. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. publish calendar 2. publish single event to same URL Actual Results: the other events were deleted Expected Results: the event should be added to the existing calendar file, not replace it
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
When using the Tools->Publish Selected Events option, the file entered is overwritten if it exists with no warning or choice. - This makes sense if you want to publish a subset of your calendar to be viewed by others. - It doesn't make sense if you add a new event to your calendar and want to add it to that published calendar. You must find all the original events, including the new one, and publish again. This feature would be much more useful if it discovered the existence of the file and prompted for overwrite/append/cancel.
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8a5) Gecko/20050203 Mozilla Sunbird/0.2 I'm not sure I should open a new bug for this, but here's my problem, I wan't to have a calendar shared. I first have to create it locally, create an event, publish it, delete that calendar and finally suscribe to it remotly. If I don't delete the calendar and suscribe to it, every time I publish my calendar, it overwrites anything published from another computer. So either, there should be an option when subscribing to create the calendar if it doesn't exists, or the publishing procedure shouldn't overwrite anything created from outside the local calendar. I even think the best solution would be to be able to change the status from a calendar with 3 different status : "local", "publish to remote" and "synchronize with remote". When a calendar is local, you can't publish or update, neither input a URL, when it's "publish to remote", every modification triggers an upload which erases anything present on the remote site, a URL is mandatory. When "synchronize" is choosen, every modification is published without erasing the remote modification (which get's added locally, if missing).
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 218983 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 4•18 years ago
|
||
The bugspam monkeys have been set free and are feeding on Calendar :: General. Be afraid for your sanity!
QA Contact: gurganbl → general
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•