Closed
Bug 271767
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
allow alternate "From" addresses w/o full account creation
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Account Manager, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: mozilla, Assigned: mscott)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Build Identifier: version 0.9 (20041103) I use multiple "From" addr's for different vendors and different email lists (though my name is generally the same). It's a way of tracking where spam comes from and separating out the wheat from the chaff. Right now, I have to go through a full account creation anytime I want to create an alternate 'from' addr. I generally use a bogus pop account with a bogus server name "h" or "j", or whatever single letter I hit first. I then 1) have to uncheck the immediately download messages button 2) specify some ascii text in server field 3) goto account settings and disable auto email checking on the account 4) goto folder settings and have the new account's "Sent" mail point to my main account's sent mail (I use name "Record", would be nice if it could just take the defaults from my main mail account. 5) set the saved and templates folders to the folders under my main email account. ------- Note that even though I have created numerous (>30 from accounts), mail to any of these accounts ends up in a folder under my main IMAP account where email is sorted by list or domain (or into Spam folders for a few blacklisted accounts that are inactive and have been circulated on every spam list known to man!) Note that MS Outhouse has had this ability since Office XP (though Outhouse doesn't work on XP with IMAP folders after applying a mandatory security patch about 2 years back -- MS support was unable to solve the problem -- big surprise). Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. I think this suggestion/bugfix has been suggested in various forms but I couldn't find one that fit my description, exactly, so I created this one "anew"...sorry if a previous bug exactly described this problem. Thanks! -linda p.s. -- marking this "major", since the workaround is a major pain that forces creating of tons of bogus accounts and selecting the correct "From" addr from a random list of 30+ entries is getting more difficult as new entries are added.
Why don't you use the Multiple Identies (Bug 44863)? http://kb.mozillazine.org/index.phtml?title=Thunderbird_:_FAQs_:_Multiple_Identities Where you can specify other adresses for an account (but your SMTP server for that account must accept that address). You can then select this address in the FROM field. Or do you mean something free-editable? That is Bug 87987.
URL: n/a
Severity: major → normal
Comment 2•19 years ago
|
||
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more reproduction information if you have it. If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. Thank you for your help in this matter. The latest beta releases can be obtained from: Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
This is fixed via multiple identity support and via the even more free-form 'virtual identity' extension... Multiple thanks....sorry for forgetting about closing this bug....sorta makes me wonder why I bother writing bug reports as the feature seems to have been implemented completely independantly of this request. I note of the 13 "bug-about-to-timeout" messages I received, 2 were features that should have been there but hadn't been done yet. Another was a fairly specific feature not included in Outlook (this one) that was fixed independant of this report (so that wasn't worth filing). 1 I marked as working well enough for me though I didn't perform thorough testing to duplicate all the problems that I originally had -- this bugfix (multiple ID's) "sorta" cleaned up most of the problems I was having with the new defaults. It may still be a bug, but since I'm not creating new accounts for alternate From addresses now, I no longer exercise that area of the code, thus my resolution of "WORKSFORME". However 9 of the 13 problems are not resolved, so statistically, that does that mean you are closing out roughly 70% of the bugs outstanding are unlikely to to be fixed in the code? As someone who spent time in QA, that isn't a great record, but as you mention... time and resources are limited....and can I relate to that(!)...(*sigh*)
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•19 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
We don't know what fixed this worksforme
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago → 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
I believe this was fixed by adding the feature of alternate user identities/account and by the [non-core] addition of the "virual-user" extension. I believe both of these are by design, though the arbitrary addition of a "From" address is a non-CORE extension that is subject to a need for 3rd party maintenance as the mailer evolves... Should this be "re-opened", as an "RFE" towards the idea that as with perl, there might be some base library of extensions that become part of the core distribution (either that, or the feature is implemented in the base obviating the need for it as an extension)?
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•