Closed
Bug 272333
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
550 5.0.0 Sorry,no access allowed error when sending messages
Categories
(Thunderbird :: General, defect)
Thunderbird
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
EXPIRED
People
(Reporter: capspb12, Assigned: mscott)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0 I'm using Thunderbird 0.9 with 3 different profiles, all using IMAP to retrieve messages and each using a separate unauthenticated SMTP server to send messages. I am using Thunderbird 0.9 on both a Windows XP SP2 system and a Fedora Core 2 system, and am having the same problem. For nearly 4 weeks, I was sending and receiving messages with no problems. Yesterday, I wasn't able to send messages from the Linux side, and now today I can't send them from the Windows side. A colleague at work has a similar problem with her install of Thunderbird 0.9 on Windows XP SP2. It's not just one SMTP server that doesn't work, all 3 of them stop working at the same time. I am also using the same version on my Fedora Core 2 system at work, with a similar set up (3 accounts), but haven't had any problems with it yet. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open Thunderbird 2. Click Write 3. Put in To:, Subject, Body 4. Click Send Actual Results: It tries to connect to the SMTP server, then pops up with a message box that says: "An error occured while sending mail. The mail server responded: 5.0.0 Sorry,no access allowed. Please verify that your email address is correct in your Mail preferences and try again." Expected Results: It should have sent the message and copied it to the sent mail folder I ran Thunderbird while making a log as suggested on the online help and this is the output of the log: 0[284970]: SMTP Connecting to: geology.umd.edu 0[284970]: SMTP entering state: 0 0[284970]: SMTP Response: 220 geology.umd.edu ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.10/8.12.10; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:13:25 -0500 (EST) 0[284970]: SMTP entering state: 15 0[284970]: SMTP Send: EHLO [192.168.0.100] 0[284970]: SMTP entering state: 0 0[284970]: SMTP Response: 250-geology.umd.edu Hello pool-138-88-203-106.res.east.verizon.net [138.88.203.106], pleased to meet you 0[284970]: SMTP entering state: 0 0[284970]: SMTP Response: 250 ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 0[284970]: SMTP entering state: 4 0[284970]: SMTP entering state: 22 0[284970]: SMTP entering state: 3 0[284970]: SMTP Send: MAIL FROM:<karwoski@geol.umd.edu> 0[284970]: SMTP entering state: 0 0[284970]: SMTP Response: 550 5.0.0 Sorry,no access allowed 0[284970]: SMTP entering state: 6 0[284970]: SMTP entering state: 12 0[284970]: SMTP entering state: 13
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
how do you know it's not a change on the server side?
(In reply to comment #1) > how do you know it's not a change on the server side? The first case of this problem arose about 6 weeks ago, which caused me to start using Thunderbird to see if I could replicate it. I've been in contact with a sysadmin for one of the servers I connect to (my work email) plus I administer one of the other servers as a RH9 box that hasn't changed since I set it up over a year ago. The sysadmin for my work email couldn't find any reason that I couldn't connect to the SMTP server and hadn't made any changes that would have caused such a problem. I'm able to telnet to the server at port 25 and get a response, so it is letting me into the SMTP port. Plus the fact that all 3 SMTP servers configured stop working at the same time.
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
the smtp log shows that you're able to connect to that port with thunderbird as well. But, if you telnet to the smtp port, can you do this:? MAIL FROM:<karwoski@geol.umd.edu> that's where the smtp server is complaining...
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
From the log Todd posted everything TB sends is correct so I don't think it's our fault. To this I was able connecting to geology.umd.edu by hand (telnet) and with TB 0.9 and got a 250 2.1.0 <karwoski@geol.umd.edu>... Sender ok. in response to my MAIL FROM:<karwoski@geol.umd.edu> both times. Todd, I suggest you to use telnet and not only try to connect but do what TB in the log did. From what you wrote (no problems at work), it sounds like the problem is somewhere on the line between your computer and the server(s).
I'm at work right now, so I can't try anything out until later tonight. If it's a problem with the connection between my computer and the server, why did another computer (one here at work) have the same problem? I tried other smtp servers but none of them would connect, each giving the same error? Plus, it's only TB that is having problems; no other email program on the same system has a similar problem. I'll try telneting to each of the 3 servers later tonight and see what output I get and post it here. Thanks for the help.
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #5) > If it's a problem with the connection between my computer and the server, why > did another computer (one here at work) have the same problem? It has? I read "I am also using the same version on my Fedora Core 2 system at work [...] but haven't had any problems with it yet." as you don't, sorry. > Plus, it's only TB that is having problems; no other email program on the same > system has a similar problem. Ok, that's an interesting information. But unfortunately none that gives me a new idea for now. But there's another thing that's different between your and my logs. 220 geology.umd.edu ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.10/8.12.10; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:59:41 -0500 (EST) EHLO [192.168.0.3] 250-geology.umd.edu Hello nrbg-d9bb7cf1.pool.mediaWays.net [217.187.124.241], pleased to meet you 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 6000000 250-DSN 250-ETRN 250-DELIVERBY 250 HELP MAIL FROM:<karwoski@geol.umd.edu> 250 2.1.0 <karwoski@geol.umd.edu>... Sender ok Your log only contains "250 ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES" but I get a long list. Since this is before any authentication or similar the server seems to distinguish connecting clients somehow. Maybe that has another cause, maybe the same.
OK, I ran TB at my work computer making a log file while I sent a message. The output from the log matches what you got when you connected to our SMTP server here. Here's the output: 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP Connecting to: geology.umd.edu 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 0 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP Response: 220 geology.umd.edu ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.10/8.12.10; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:08:27 -0500 (EST) 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 15 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP Send: EHLO [128.8.50.23] 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 0 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP Response: 250-geology.umd.edu Hello iceman.umd.edu [128.8.50.23], pleased to meet you 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 0 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP Response: 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 0 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP Response: 250-PIPELINING 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 0 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP Response: 250-8BITMIME 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 0 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP Response: 250-SIZE 6000000 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 0 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP Response: 250-DSN 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 0 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP Response: 250-ETRN 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 0 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP Response: 250-DELIVERBY 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 0 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP Response: 250 HELP 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 4 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 22 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 3 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP Send: MAIL FROM:<karwoski@geol.umd.edu> SIZE=592 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 0 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP Response: 250 2.1.0 <karwoski@geol.umd.edu>... Sender ok 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 6 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP Send: RCPT TO:<karwoski@wam.umd.edu> 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 0 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP Response: 250 2.1.5 <karwoski@wam.umd.edu>... Recipient ok 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 7 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP Send: DATA 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 0 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP Response: 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 8 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 9 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP Send: . 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 0 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP Response: 250 2.0.0 iAUK8RoI003152 Message accepted for delivery 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 10 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP Send: QUIT 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 0 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 0 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP Response: 221 2.0.0 geology.umd.edu closing connection 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 11 1901632[8cb5040]: SMTP entering state: 13 Later I'll try telnetting from home and I'll post the output then.
Alright, I've been trying things out on my home computer. I first booted my computer into WinXP and tried sending a message in TB with the same results. I did find something curious. Our servers deny relaying to addresses off campus, so in order to send an email from home, I have to use a VPN to connect to a campus server. When I did this and tried sending a message to a Hotmail address, it went through without any problems. When I disconnected, it stopped working. Now, I believe I tried this on my colleagues computer, and it did fail even with the VPN connected, but it's a curiosity. I tried telneting to the server (telnet geology.umd.edu 25) but got connection refused errors. I could ping the server itself and get a response, but it wouldn't connect on port 25, even with the VPN connected. I'm now logged into Fedora and I am again unable to send messages with TB. I don't have the VPN for Linux configured right, so I can't test that part right now. From Linux, I can telnet to port 25 on geology.umd.edu, but when I try "MAIL FROM:<karwoski@geol.umd.edu>" I get "550 5.0.0 Sorry,no access allowed" and nothing else. Hopefully this is helpful.
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
so if you see the same error from telnet, "550 5.0.0 Sorry,no access allowed", doesn't it seem like it's an issue with your connection to your server, and not thunderbird?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
If it's a problem with my connection, how do you explain the fact that I can send mail using programs other than TB?
Comment 11•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #10) > If it's a problem with my connection, how do you explain the fact that I can > send mail using programs other than TB? If you're sure they don't log in and therefore are allowed to send mails, a external log should help to see what they do. On Linux Ethereal or tcpdump should be contained in the distribution. For Windows you'll need to download and install them seperately.
Comment 12•19 years ago
|
||
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more reproduction information if you have it. If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. Thank you for your help in this matter. The latest beta releases can be obtained from: Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
Comment 13•19 years ago
|
||
This bug has been automatically resolved after a period of inactivity (see above comment). If anyone thinks this is incorrect, they should feel free to reopen it.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → EXPIRED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•