Closed
Bug 273483
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
param(sendmailnow) information is very out-of-date and not helpful.
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Administration, task)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Bugzilla 2.16
People
(Reporter: shane.h.w.travis, Assigned: shane.h.w.travis)
Details
Attachments
(2 files, 3 obsolete files)
|
1.05 KB,
patch
|
justdave
:
review+
goobix
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
|
889 bytes,
patch
|
justdave
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Talking with Dave about what 'sendmailnow' was supposed to do, and the information on the 'defparams.cgi' page is so far off the mark as almost to be dangerous. Updating it to reflect what Dave told me.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
so simple it's almost a documentation bug. :)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
It's always the little things -- like periods for concatenation -- that mess you up. D'oh!
Attachment #168099 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
| Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #168101 -
Flags: review?(justdave)
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 168101 [details] [diff] [review] Code patch for 2.18 and tip, take 2 >+ desc => 'Sites using older versions of \'sendmail\' (anything up to ' . >+ '8.12) can achieve a significant performance increase in the ' . Should say "anything older than 8.12" or "anything up to 8.11.x" for clarity here, lest anything think 8.12 is included :) >+ 'UI -- at the cost of delaying the sending of mail -- by ' . >+ 'enabling this parameter. Sites using \'sendmail\' 8.12 or ' . "by disabling this parameter" The rest looks good, this is a VAST improvement. :)
Attachment #168101 -
Flags: review?(justdave) → review-
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
Well, I did say 'up to' and not 'up to and including'... but I agree that this way is clearer. As for the enable/disable... Umm... I meant to do that. It was a test. Yeah... that's the ticket...
Attachment #168101 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
| Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #168102 -
Flags: review?(justdave)
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #168102 -
Flags: review+
Updated•20 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Flags: approval?
Flags: approval2.18?
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 168102 [details] [diff] [review] Code patch for 2.18 and tip, take 3 Looks good. I think this is worthy of going on the 2.16 branch as well, but the format of the defparams.pl file is different, so it'll need to be backported.
Attachment #168102 -
Flags: review?(justdave)
Updated•20 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.16
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
Ask, and ye shall receive; 2.16 patch attached.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
Bah, got the diffs in the wrong direction, so they probably wouldn't apply cleanly. This one works correctly. Just goes to prove the old saying; the hurrier I go, the behinder I get.
Attachment #168220 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
| Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #168223 -
Flags: review?(justdave)
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 168223 [details] [diff] [review] Code patch for 2.16, take 2 nit: the escaping of the quotes around 'sendmail' is unnecessary because the string itself is using a different quote character. otherwise r=justdave
Attachment #168223 -
Flags: review?(justdave) → review+
Updated•20 years ago
|
Flags: approval?
Flags: approval2.18?
Flags: approval2.18+
Flags: approval2.16+
Flags: approval+
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
Checking in defparams.pl; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/defparams.pl,v <-- defparams.pl new revision: 1.140; previous revision: 1.139 done Checking in defparams.pl; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/defparams.pl,v <-- defparams.pl new revision: 1.128.2.3; previous revision: 1.128.2.2 done Checking in defparams.pl; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/defparams.pl,v <-- defparams.pl new revision: 1.73.2.10; previous revision: 1.73.2.9 done
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•12 years ago
|
QA Contact: matty_is_a_geek → default-qa
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•