273527 - Add numbers of messages matching each MailView to the dropdown box item

Status: UNCONFIRMED

(Thunderbird :: Mail Window Front End, enhancement)

Description

[Alexander Myodov]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1) Opera 7.53  [en]
Build Identifier: Mozilla Thunderbird version 1.0 (20041206)

Please find suggested behaviour in "Steps to Reproduce", "Actual Results" and 
"Expected Results" fields.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Open "View" dropdown in main client window.
Actual Results:  
You see items "All", "Unread"; "Important", "Work", "Personal", etc.

Expected Results:  
You should see items "All (2530)", "Unread (3)"; "Important (17)", "Work (0)", 
"Personal (6)", etc.

Comment 1

[Gervase Markham [:gerv]]

This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01".

This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that
bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are
highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code.

While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we
are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce
this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a
copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and
you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug
(given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more
reproduction information if you have it.

If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not
changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved.
Thank you for your help in this matter.

The latest beta releases can be obtained from:
Firefox:     http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/
Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html
Seamonkey:   http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/

Comment 2

[Alexander Myodov]

> for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version
> and you still believe we should implement it
I believe, it would be better to have this little feature than to miss it.