Closed
Bug 273840
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
Cursor doesn't move through <select> element in editor
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Editor, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
EXPIRED
People
(Reporter: sveta, Assigned: mozeditor)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 In Internet Explorer code: <div contentEditable="true">Tra la la. <select onchange="changeSelOnText(this)"><option>1</option><option>2</option></select> Tra la la.</div> Allow edit text, choose options in listbox, fire even "onchange". In Mozilla I can't write code, which will work like code bellow. I can edit text, insert or delete listbox, but I can't choose option in listbox. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open http://www.mozilla.org/editor/midasdemo/ 2.Set checkbox "View HTML Source" checked 3.Write in window: "Tra la la. <select><option>1</option><option>2</option></select> Tra la la." 4.Set checkbox "View HTML Source" unchecked 5.Set cursor at the begining of the row and move cursor by rigth arrow button on keyboard Actual Results: When cursor reach <select> element, cursor jamp at the begining of the row Expected Results: Cursor must set focus on <select> element and then move on
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
Mats, didn't you run into this recently?
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
The closest one I can think of is bug 268497 but that's a different problem, I think. I do see the described behaviour in Mozilla 1.7.3 on Linux, but the "Actual Results" is different in a 2005-01-11 trunk Linux build. The caret does not jump to the beginning, it ends up on the right side of the <select>. (The caret does not seem to enter into the <select> though). If I change the select to <select multiple="multiple"> then I can at least edit one of the options (2), but I can't navigate to the other. This bug seems more like a keyboard navigation problem.
OS: Windows 2000 → All
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
Ginn Chen is the man who knows about these kinds of bugs.
Do we need choose option in midas? I don't think so. But I can't go through the following HTML by right arrow(left arrow works), it may be a bug. Tra la la. <select multiple="multiple"><option>1</option><option> 2</option></select> Tra la la.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
Dear Ginn Chen, in IE in <div contentEditable="true"> it is possible to use <select> tag and choose options. This allows to create aplications where there are the templates which can be edited by users. Therefore, to choose <option> in midas is very important for us. Furthermore, to catch event onchange from tag <select> is also useful.
Is it a feature request of midas? It's not only a keyboard navigation bug, I can't choose a option in midas by mouse, either.
Comment 7•19 years ago
|
||
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more reproduction information if you have it. If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. Thank you for your help in this matter. The latest beta releases can be obtained from: Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
Comment 8•19 years ago
|
||
This bug has been automatically resolved after a period of inactivity (see above comment). If anyone thinks this is incorrect, they should feel free to reopen it.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → EXPIRED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•