Closed
Bug 274019
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
[RFE] Filter spam by learning what is good email in stead of bad email
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: General, enhancement)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
EXPIRED
People
(Reporter: mozilla, Unassigned)
Details
(Whiteboard: INVALID?)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 The current junk filter uses some kind of learning algorithm to learn what spam is, but lots of stuff comes through anyway (mostly because of the wide diversity in spam). I think it would be a better solution to have it learn what is the 'good' email, since that will only be business/frineds related, and thus much narrower in scope. (everything else would then be spam) Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. mark email as junk 2. get different type of spam 3. go to 1.
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
Actually, the algorithm does both -- remember what sort of things you marked as junk, and remember which sort of things it thought were junk but you marked as not junk. Tossing all mail into junk by default seems like a bad idea, since it'll cause people to miss mail...
Whiteboard: INVALID?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
The things is, after a year or seomthing, it knows everything that is not junk, so all new type of email (like the rolex spam) must in fact be junk, but I still have to mark it as junk the first few times. And since there is always new types of spam..
Updated•20 years ago
|
Version: unspecified → 1.7 Branch
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more reproduction information if you have it. If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. Thank you for your help in this matter. The latest beta releases can be obtained from: Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
This bug has been automatically resolved after a period of inactivity (see above comment). If anyone thinks this is incorrect, they should feel free to reopen it.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → EXPIRED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•