Closed
Bug 274133
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Analyze headers in junk filter
Categories
(Thunderbird :: General, enhancement)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: jlquinn, Assigned: mscott)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041007 Galeon/1.3.18 (Debian package 1.3.18-1.1) Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041007 Galeon/1.3.18 (Debian package 1.3.18-1.1) It seems like thunderbird doesn't look at headers when learning what is spam. The filter is pretty good, but I already run a pop3 spam proxy (POPfile) that appends a header to emails. I actively train that one, and if thunderbird would look at the header, it would probably be able to be more accurate. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
You can create a new message filter, which checks for this specific header and then marks the message as spam. Invalid (i dont think we can check for every header a anti-spam program creates, there are too many of them)?
WFM A quick look in my training.dat file shows From: headers, To: headers and x-header-noreverseip:ip.name.lookup.failed[222.77.23.102] as well as hundreds if not thousands of other headers listed. TB bayesian junk filter does filter the headers too. If you train TB on the mail already marked by your other filter it should learn fast to mark anything with that header as junk, however if some of the legitimate mail gets marked by the other filter it may mess up the weighting especially if you retrain it in TB. Also try setting up a 'Message Filter' for the other spam filters appended header(s) to filter them out and select "Set Junk status to: Junk'. This will also help auto train TB based on the other filters results. Also you may want to look at the thread http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=167758
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
we add tokens for each header
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•