Closed
Bug 274619
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Using XPCOM for modules?
Categories
(Webtools Graveyard :: Mozbot, enhancement)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: mortenjo, Assigned: ian)
Details
I was procrastinating today, and started browsing the various mozilla-pages. First I happened onto the XPCOM pages, and after a deal of reading, found it to be an interesting technology and worthy of later consideration. Then, a bit later I found MozBot, and saw that it had pluggable modules, and thought to myself: "I bet they used XPCOM for that! It would be perfect, allowing modules to be written in 'any' language, so that people could use what they were used to, instead of being forced to use Perl." No such luck though, so here's a feature request instead... :D
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
You don't need XPCOM for this -- I wrote a mozbot BotModule in EuScheme once, it worked fine. The key is just to have a special thunk module from the perl to the other language. I have no intention whatsoever of ever trying to add XPCOM to mozbot.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Updated•18 years ago
|
QA Contact: kerz → mozbot
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: Webtools → Webtools Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•