Closed
Bug 277012
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
RadioStateChange event doesn't fire for select-losing <radio>
Categories
(Core :: Widget, defect)
Core
Widget
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
DUPLICATE
of bug 320369
People
(Reporter: BenB, Unassigned)
References
(Depends on 1 open bug)
Details
Attachments
(3 obsolete files)
The official ;-) reference doc <http://www.xulplanet.com/references/elemref/ref_radiogroup.html#prop_selectedItem> as well as the name implies that the RadioStateChange event should fire twice during a change - once for the newly selected <radio> and once for the <radio> which was previously selected. That would be needed anyways (because these events fire after the change has been performed, you can check the state in the handler via event.target.selected). However, currently, only the newly selected radio gets the event. The radio losing the select doesn't notice it. Attaching a patch to fix it.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
Attachment #170252 -
Flags: review?(jag)
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
> The official ;-) reference doc > <http://www.xulplanet.com/references/elemref/ref_radiogroup.html#prop_selectedItem> > as well as the name implies Actually, re-reading the xulplanet sentence, it says the *opposite*, but the name of the event implies to me that it should fire for both, plus there are good use cases for it.
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 170252 [details] [diff] [review] Fix Nit: I think it would more intuitive to fire the state change event for the old radio button first.
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
In fact, if you do that, you don't need to cache oldSelected. You can instead just fire the event where you are currently setting that.
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
> Nit: I think it would more intuitive to fire the state change event > for the old radio button first. Agreed (and I think it's more than a nit, it matters for app developers) > In fact, if you do that, you don't need to cache oldSelected. You can instead > just fire the event where you are currently setting that. I need to set it up, too. Easier (smaller change) this way IMHO.
Attachment #170252 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #170253 -
Flags: review?(jag)
Reporter | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #170252 -
Flags: review?(jag)
Reporter | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #170253 -
Attachment description: Fix, v1 → Fix, v2
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
While working with it, I needed to remove that |if (focused)|, too, because that prevented the event from firing when the selection got changed programmatically in onload and co. It's something I could work around, but I guess typical uses may want to see that.
Attachment #170267 -
Flags: review?(jag)
Comment 7•16 years ago
|
||
Ben, are still working on this ? *** </xpfe/global/resources/content/bindings/radio.xml> is obsolete. </toolkit/content/widgets/radio.xml> is the one to fix now. Is a v3 patch like was is wanted ?
Assignee: ben.bucksch → jag
Component: XP Apps → XP Toolkit/Widgets
OS: Linux → All
Product: Mozilla Application Suite → Core
QA Contact: pawyskoczka → xptoolkit.widgets
Hardware: PC → All
Version: 1.7 Branch → Trunk
Updated•16 years ago
|
Flags: wanted1.9.0.x?
Comment 8•16 years ago
|
||
Not wanted for 1.9.0.x. We've lived with this for a long time. Try requesting blocking/wanted1.9.1.
Flags: wanted1.9.0.x? → wanted1.9.0.x-
Updated•16 years ago
|
Flags: wanted1.9.1?
Comment on attachment 170267 [details] [diff] [review] Proposed Fix, v3 This patch has been sitting around for years. Neil, what do you think should happen here? (Note that the XPFE version of this file no longer exists, but the patch looks like it applies (roughly, at least) to toolkit/content/widgets/radio.xml .)
Attachment #170267 -
Flags: review?(enndeakin)
Comment 10•16 years ago
|
||
This has already been fixed by bug 320369.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #170253 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #170253 -
Flags: review?(jag)
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #170267 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #170267 -
Flags: review?(jag)
Attachment #170267 -
Flags: review?(enndeakin)
Comment 11•16 years ago
|
||
V.Duplicate Yet, I filed bug 456038 as a followup...
Assignee: jag → nobody
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Component: XUL → Widget
Flags: wanted1.9.1?
QA Contact: xptoolkit.widgets → general
Flags: wanted1.9.1-
Flags: blocking1.9.1-
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•