277919 - Event view shows events outside of scope for reoccuring events

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 281501

(Calendar :: Sunbird Only, defect)

Description

[Paul]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041110 Firefox/1.0
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041110 Firefox/1.0

If you have a reoccuring event (say a birthday yearly) on for example the 11 of
January from 8-8:30 am and then on the 11th of January after 8:30am the event is
show in the even view as 11th January 2006 even tho the event view is set to
"Events in the next 14 days"


Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Create reoccuring event
2.Event view to 14 days on day of event
3.See shown event is one year later

Actual Results:  
The event is not within 14 days as the selection criteria defines

Expected Results:  
Not shown the event at all, or show it as the current one for the day

Comment 1

[Martin Schröder [:mschroeder]]

WFM in current Sunbird nightlys.

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060329 Mozilla Sunbird/0.3a1+

Comment 2

[Joey Minta]

I think this bug is asking for past events to be removed from the unifinder when 'Events in the next 14 days is selected'.  (By 'past' I mean still today but expired in the last few hours.)  In that case, this isn't WFM, but I think I've seen this somewhere else before.

Comment 3

[Martin Schröder [:mschroeder]]

Maybe this is nearly the same as bug 281501 ? So one of these bugs can be marked DUPLICATE. But we should sum up the "problems" with the unifinder and today events because both bugs started with not very helpful descriptions.

Comment 4

[Joey Minta]

(In reply to comment #3)
> Maybe this is nearly the same as bug 281501 ? So one of these bugs can be
> marked DUPLICATE. But we should sum up the "problems" with the unifinder and
> today events because both bugs started with not very helpful descriptions.
> 
Yep, that's it. :-) Marking duplicate, since that report is a bit cleaner.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 281501 ***