User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0 StumbleUpon/1.999 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0 StumbleUpon/1.999 IMAP server performs badly because of all folders get checked in one blast at the end of the check-for-new-mail delay. TB should either divide the delay by the number of folders or provide a check-for-new-mail delay per folder. TB should ultimately add a new feature to the folder-subscription screen. Besides the existing checkbox that subscribes to each folder, it should also provide a checkbox to check that folder for new mail and a check-for-new-mail delay. The rationale is that TB doesn't need to check some folders as often as others, and TB wouldn't be "out to lunch" when I want to read an important message. For example, TB should poll a "Likely Spam" folder less often than a "Friends" folder. Perhaps you could split this into two bugs. One for an easier, short-term fix that divides the delay by the folders, and another for a longer-term change to the folder-subscription screen. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: n/a Actual Results: n/a Expected Results: n/a
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → EXPIRED
Still hoping someone will implement this.
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: EXPIRED → ---
David, wontfix? randomize? 6e77a doesn't state what precise conditions are a problem for the server.
Assignee: mscott → bienvenu
Component: General → Networking: IMAP
Product: Thunderbird → Core
QA Contact: general → networking.imap
Wayne, I don't understand what information you're looking for.
you say "IMAP server performs badly". how do you know this? how *exactly* is your server taking a performance hit? what traffic is now occurring that's taxing the server that your suggestion would avoid?
Changing from "major" to "enhancement". It might be worth changing the summary to something like "allow check-for-new-mail interval to be set per-folder" (I haven't checked to see if that would be a duplicate). Regarding the short-term fix, I don't think that's a good idea -- let's say you have 120 folders with "check for new mail" set, with a 2-minute update. Then it would theoretically need to start checking a folder every second, and have to track if it fell behind, or something like that. Seems messy to me.
Severity: major → enhancement
the new imap auto sync stuff makes this somewhat less important, as it updates folder on idle, but no more frequently than the check for new mail interval. Assigning to nobody, though this might be wontfix.
Assignee: bienvenu → nobody
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Product: Core → MailNews Core
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.