278624 - Site http://www.tvfilm.hu/ is not displayed since v1.7.5

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 275003

(SeaMonkey :: General, defect)

Description

[Webmaster33]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a6) Gecko/20050111 MultiZilla/1.7.0.1h
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a6) Gecko/20050111 MultiZilla/1.7.0.1h

Site http://www.tvfilm.hu/ is not displayed since Mozilla v1.7.5.
Blank page is displayed.

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1

[Stephen Donner [:stephend] Not actively reading bugmail]

worksforme with 2005-01-16-05, 1.8b on Windows XP.

Comment 2

[Webmaster33]

Just found the problem. I disabled the Memory cache earlier.
When Memory cache is disabled, the displayed site disappears.
So while I found a workaround for the bug, I do not mark it as Fixed, since it
seems, turning off Memory cache, causes many bugs.

The question is, if Memory cache is disabled, why I get such effects?

When Memory cache is disabled, some links are not working, some sites are not
loaded. This is a bad behaviour.

Comment 3

[Webmaster33]

Current version footprint is:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a6) Gecko/20050111
MultiZilla/1.7.0.1j

Comment 4

[Stephen Donner [:stephend] Not actively reading bugmail]

(In reply to comment #2)
> Just found the problem. I disabled the Memory cache earlier.

Not supported; that is why there isn't UI exposed for this behavior.

> When Memory cache is disabled, the displayed site disappears.
> So while I found a workaround for the bug, I do not mark it as Fixed, since it
> seems, turning off Memory cache, causes many bugs.
> 
> The question is, if Memory cache is disabled, why I get such effects?

Because it's not supported?
> 
> When Memory cache is disabled, some links are not working, some sites are not
> loaded. This is a bad behaviour.
> 

You're right, it is.  There were bugs on it, but in the end we decided not to
expose this pref through the user interface.  As such, we don't support memory
cache being disabled.  Tempted to mark INVALID, but this might also be an
outright DUP of our outstanding memory cache bugs.

Comment 5

[Webmaster33]

Then this bug may be a dupe, but not invalid anyway!

Comment 6

[Stephen Donner [:stephend] Not actively reading bugmail]

Let me be perfectly clear:  Memory cache is now a percentage of your system
memory (RAM), and should NOT be set down to 0 by the user.

See the many bugs listed in
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=mem+cache&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&resolution=FIXED&resolution=WONTFIX&resolution=DUPLICATE&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=exact&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailqa_contact2=1&emailtype2=exact&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=

Comment 7

[Stephen Donner [:stephend] Not actively reading bugmail]

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 275003 ***