User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 netscape 7 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 netscape 7 I sent this to the Licensing dept at Mozilla and they suggested that I submit it here. Please look at http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/!ut/p/_s.7_0_A/7_0_1OB?contentidonly=true&contentid=Help_Technical_Requirements.xml or www.usda.gov > Help > Techology Requirements. The site implies that Mozilla may be less standards-compliant than the browsers they are supporting. Even tho' it may be legitimate for them to say that certain browsers work better for their site, they can't say it's because others aren't compliant. Since I'm not in a position to bring this to their attention with any effect, I hope you'll have your lawyers write to their lawyers about it. I'm sure you won't need to mention my email address either. (The site does in fact work fine in Mozilla - I just think they've no business making comments which are not only deroggatory but not true). Reproducible: Always
Conforming summary to TFM item 10 at http://www.mozilla.org/projects/tech-evangelism/site/procedures.html#file-new Reporter, when you file a TE bug, please follow the reporting guidelines.
its not quite an insult, just a clueless comment.
contacted via web form
Matti, did you ever hear anything back from them? They've still got the same comment there.
I can't remember if I got a response. I think I got one that they will change the site but I'm not sure and they didn't change it. marking incomplete