Closed
Bug 279813
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
Stand up SCM services for l10n developers
Categories
(Mozilla Localizations :: Other, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: chase, Unassigned)
References
Details
This is a general bug for getting the main SCM services put together for l10n developers.
| Reporter | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
| Reporter | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
Mass reassign of open bugs for chase@mozilla.org to build@mozilla-org.bugs.
Assignee: chase → build
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Comment 2•19 years ago
|
||
l10n contributors use CVS now, looks like all dependencies are resolved.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
Debatable. We still have things like bonsai links in lxr not being right etc. I'm pretty sure those bugs are filed, but they don't have dependencies for this one.
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3) > Debatable. We still have things like bonsai links in lxr not being right etc. > I'm pretty sure those bugs are filed, but they don't have dependencies for > this one. > Axel, is this bug 281910? Let me know of any other problems (or set them as deps on this bug) so we can get them resolved.
Comment 5•18 years ago
|
||
I'm resolving this fixed. It may not be, but we need more information about what's broken, other than "main SCM services." If it's just bug 281910, then let's fix that. If there are other issues for l10n devs, then let's file new bugs for each specific issue.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago → 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 6•18 years ago
|
||
Hrm. Why resolve a tracking bug with open dependencies? I'd prefer to resolve this once bug 281910 is resolved. I recall that that's not peanuts, though.
Comment 7•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #6) > Hrm. Why resolve a tracking bug with open dependencies? > > I'd prefer to resolve this once bug 281910 is resolved. I recall that that's > not peanuts, though. Two reasons: it was unclear (to me) this was a tracking bug; I see the dependent bugs now, but if you weren't looking closely, all you had was a bug that said "Make SCM services better," which was also unclear. I probably would've noticed this was a tracking bug if the initial comment had had "this is what's broken; a. blah, b. foo, c. bar, etc." Also, this bug is basically a dup now that every bug except for 281910 is fixed. Let's leave this closed if it really is just that one bug... but I'll try to be better about noticing tracking bugs in the future.
Updated•11 years ago
|
Assignee: build → nobody
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•