Closed Bug 281391 Opened 20 years ago Closed 20 years ago

Bad render of text using 800x600 resolution

Categories

(Core :: Layout, defect)

x86
Windows XP
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED INVALID

People

(Reporter: raul.moratalla, Unassigned)

References

()

Details

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; es-ES; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041108 Firefox/1.0 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; es-ES; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041108 Firefox/1.0 In the page http://www.eps.ua.es you can see the text at the bottom(right): "como usuario anonimo" and "como usuario de la EPS". If I use resolution 800x600 the links are mixed with the text below and it's no posible to acces to the link. If I use 1024 I can view the page without any problem Reproducible: Always
This Page Is Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional! http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eps.ua.es%2F but has an error in CSS: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eps.ua.es%2F Errors URI : http://www.eps.ua.es/ * Line: 63 Invalid number : vertical-alignsupper is not a vertical-align value : supper From the source: <p class="gn" style="vertical-align:supper">Titulaciones</p> but that is not the reason for wrong display on 800x600. Having a 100% validated HTML and CSS doesn´t prevent you from making a visually broken layout. Some <div>s have height specified in %, others in px. If you add 55% and 21 px, you get 87 px in 800x600 screen resolution. If neigbouring <div>s are specified 87px and 21 px, this will fit in 800x600 What will that give if you change the total heigth? 55% and 21px then will add to 105 px, the neighbours will stay, so adding up to 98px, and you will see a 7 px difference somewhere. You can use DOM Inspector to check the positions and see the structure of the page. I would suggest resolving this bug as invalid.
Yep, this is just a bug in the page... it sets explicit heights that are too small for the content.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.