Closed Bug 282067 Opened 20 years ago Closed 19 years ago

Update firefox translation

Categories

(Mozilla Localizations :: es-ES / Spanish, defect)

x86
Linux
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED INVALID

People

(Reporter: omgs, Assigned: omgs)

References

()

Details

Attachments

(2 files)

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; es-ES; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; es-ES; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 There have been many changes since 1.0 relase. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
Attachment #174171 - Flags: approval-l10n?
Attachment #174171 - Flags: approval-aviary1.0.1?
Attachment #174172 - Flags: approval-l10n?
Attachment #174172 - Flags: approval-aviary1.0.1?
Ok, if you don't want to update the translation and have an outdated and buggy translation, it's up to you. If there's something I'm missing, please be more explicit.
We _ONLY_ take changes to aviary if either it's a new locale or if it fixes a security problem (e.g. wrong wording on a security-related dialog). All other improvements are welcome, but won't go into the aviary 1.x branch, they have to go into trunk.
Oscar, 1.0.1 is a security/stability fix release, not a "product" release. The only localisation fixes that might be accepted are bugs that would make the product unstable or some of its features broken. For example if in 1.0 you had translated something that you shouldn't have translated (like translating a 'true' boolean value to 'verdad') and that this incorrect translation makes some visible feature buggy or makes Firefox crash, a patch fixing it *might* be accepted. Otherwise, language patches won't be accepted because the priority is to fix our security holes and release 1.0.1 with all security patches as soon as possible before they get exploited by spyware, viruses or phishing sites. Personnally I would mark the bug as invalid, not because improving localization isn't important (we have strings in the FR build that we'd love to see corrected as well ;) ) but simply because it is not what 1.0.1 was meant for and accepting localization improvements would delay the planned release.
Comment on attachment 174171 [details] [diff] [review] Attachment for toolkit branch This should be asking for approval-l10n, not approval-aviary1.0.1
Attachment #174171 - Flags: approval-aviary1.0.1?
Comment on attachment 174172 [details] [diff] [review] Update patch for browser tree This should be asking for approval-l10n, not approval-aviary1.0.1
Attachment #174172 - Flags: approval-aviary1.0.1?
Comment on attachment 174171 [details] [diff] [review] Attachment for toolkit branch es-ES was released for 1.0.
Attachment #174171 - Flags: approval-l10n? → approval-l10n-
Comment on attachment 174172 [details] [diff] [review] Update patch for browser tree also here. Please, do your work for 1.1
Attachment #174172 - Flags: approval-l10n? → approval-l10n-
Bug outdated (it affected 1.0 version).
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: