Closed
Bug 282067
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
Update firefox translation
Categories
(Mozilla Localizations :: es-ES / Spanish, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: omgs, Assigned: omgs)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
53.76 KB,
patch
|
zbraniecki
:
approval-l10n-
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
20.72 KB,
patch
|
zbraniecki
:
approval-l10n-
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; es-ES; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; es-ES; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217
There have been many changes since 1.0 relase.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
Attachment #174171 -
Flags: approval-l10n?
Attachment #174171 -
Flags: approval-aviary1.0.1?
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
Attachment #174172 -
Flags: approval-l10n?
Attachment #174172 -
Flags: approval-aviary1.0.1?
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
Have you read
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/netscape.public.mozilla.l10n/browse_thread/thread/0afdeacd6e923aac/a0d4488e5fdba773#a0d4488e5fdba773
?
Seems like you didn't.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
Ok, if you don't want to update the translation and have an outdated and buggy
translation, it's up to you.
If there's something I'm missing, please be more explicit.
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
We _ONLY_ take changes to aviary if either it's a new locale or if it fixes a
security problem (e.g. wrong wording on a security-related dialog).
All other improvements are welcome, but won't go into the aviary 1.x branch,
they have to go into trunk.
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
Oscar, 1.0.1 is a security/stability fix release, not a "product" release. The
only localisation fixes that might be accepted are bugs that would make the
product unstable or some of its features broken. For example if in 1.0 you had
translated something that you shouldn't have translated (like translating a
'true' boolean value to 'verdad') and that this incorrect translation makes some
visible feature buggy or makes Firefox crash, a patch fixing it *might* be accepted.
Otherwise, language patches won't be accepted because the priority is to fix our
security holes and release 1.0.1 with all security patches as soon as possible
before they get exploited by spyware, viruses or phishing sites.
Personnally I would mark the bug as invalid, not because improving localization
isn't important (we have strings in the FR build that we'd love to see corrected
as well ;) ) but simply because it is not what 1.0.1 was meant for and accepting
localization improvements would delay the planned release.
Comment on attachment 174171 [details] [diff] [review]
Attachment for toolkit branch
This should be asking for approval-l10n, not approval-aviary1.0.1
Attachment #174171 -
Flags: approval-aviary1.0.1?
Comment on attachment 174172 [details] [diff] [review]
Update patch for browser tree
This should be asking for approval-l10n, not approval-aviary1.0.1
Attachment #174172 -
Flags: approval-aviary1.0.1?
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 174171 [details] [diff] [review]
Attachment for toolkit branch
es-ES was released for 1.0.
Attachment #174171 -
Flags: approval-l10n? → approval-l10n-
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 174172 [details] [diff] [review]
Update patch for browser tree
also here.
Please, do your work for 1.1
Attachment #174172 -
Flags: approval-l10n? → approval-l10n-
Comment 11•19 years ago
|
||
Bug outdated (it affected 1.0 version).
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•