Closed
Bug 283400
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
Address list should have option to not show list to message recipients
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Address Book, enhancement)
Thunderbird
Address Book
Tracking
(Not tracked)
People
(Reporter: jeffz8user, Unassigned)
References
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0 Address lists of friends have no privacy concerns. However, many other address lists do have privacy concerns. For these lists, it is at least embarassing and potentially harmful to allow message recipients to see the list of recipients. To hide the recipients in a message, Thunderbird requires the user to type the address list name in the Bcc: field. This is not fail-safe and typing it in the To: field is easily done and potentially disastrous. Thunderbird should provide an option in the address book such that, for selected lists, the list of contacts is never shown in a message. An add-on benefit to this is that address lists can then be entered into the To: field, intentionally or otherwise, without problem. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Create address list 2.Send a message to the address list using the To: field 3. Actual Results: Every recipient sees the list of recipients Expected Results: Allowed the list to be marked as "not to be shown" Lack of this feature makes Thunderbird too error-prone for use with sensitive mailing lists.
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more reproduction information if you have it. If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. Thank you for your help in this matter. The latest beta releases can be obtained from: Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
(In reply to comment #1) > This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". > > This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that > bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are > highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. > > While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we > are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce > this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a > copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and > you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug > (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more > reproduction information if you have it. > > If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not > changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. > Thank you for your help in this matter. > > The latest beta releases can be obtained from: > Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ > Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html > Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/ > (In reply to comment #1) > This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". > > This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that > bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are > highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. > > While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we > are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce > this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a > copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and > you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug > (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more > reproduction information if you have it. > > If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not > changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. > Thank you for your help in this matter. > > The latest beta releases can be obtained from: > Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ > Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html > Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/ > This feature remains missing from Thunderbird 1.5 Beta 1 and it is still desireable that it be added. As examples with which I am familiar: the feature is available in Microsoft Entourage as a list-specific option and in Apple Mail as an application-wide preference. The former is preferred although the second is acceptable. Lacking this feature, Thunderbird is not useable for mailing lists that require the names in the list to not appear to recipients since it is too easy to enter the list name in the "To:" field by mistake when it should have been entered in the "CC:" field of a message.
(In reply to comment #2) The last sentence should have read: "...when it should have been entered in the "Bcc:" field of a message."
Comment 4•18 years ago
|
||
dup of another bug but don't remember which ATM
OS: Mac OS X → All
Hardware: Macintosh → All
Whiteboard: dupme
Updated•18 years ago
|
QA Contact: address-book
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #0) > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; > rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0 > Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; > rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0 > > Address lists of friends have no privacy concerns. However, many other address > lists do have privacy concerns. For these lists, it is at least embarassing and > potentially harmful to allow message recipients to see the list of recipients. > > To hide the recipients in a message, Thunderbird requires the user to type the > address list name in the Bcc: field. This is not fail-safe and typing it in the > To: field is easily done and potentially disastrous. > > Thunderbird should provide an option in the address book such that, for > selected > lists, the list of contacts is never shown in a message. > > An add-on benefit to this is that address lists can then be entered into the > To: > field, intentionally or otherwise, without problem. > > Reproducible: Always > > Steps to Reproduce: > 1.Create address list > 2.Send a message to the address list using the To: field > 3. > Actual Results: > Every recipient sees the list of recipients > > Expected Results: > Allowed the list to be marked as "not to be shown" > > Lack of this feature makes Thunderbird too error-prone for use with sensitive > mailing lists. > (In reply to comment #4) > dup of another bug but don't remember which ATM > (In reply to comment #4) > dup of another bug but don't remember which ATM > (In reply to comment #4) > dup of another bug but don't remember which ATM > I send out a lot of email using email lists, and almost NEVER use a cc: -- instead, I use a single To: line and multiple bcc: lines. If there were a global option that would allow me to default ALL addresses to bcc: entries, then all I would have to do is override the SINGLE addressee that I would like to be the to:, usually myself. It is a continual hassle to ensure that I don't have any cc: items in my mailouts which would allow everyone to see my subscriber list.
Updated•16 years ago
|
Assignee: mscott → nobody
Updated•16 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 8•14 years ago
|
||
Cleanup *dupeme* whiteboard flag from bugs that are marked as Resolved Duplicate!
Whiteboard: dupme
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•