283491 - Swap default assignee and QA contact for Core :: Java: Live Connect

Status: VERIFIED FIXED

(bugzilla.mozilla.org :: Administration, task)

Description

[timeless]

I'll change it if no one objects.

Comment 1

[Brendan Eich [:brendan]]

timeless, we were going over this via email.  I don't think filing a bug was
necessary, but it does have the advantage (?) that everyone can look on and kibbitz.

Anyway, Phil has agreed, but I'm waiting for Bob to agree and give the desired
(individual, but possibly an alias) bugzilla id.

/be

Comment 2

[Bob Clary [:bc] (inactive)]

Let me think about how we want to handle this and speak with some other people
who might also want to be involved. I'll get back to you later today.

Comment 3

[Phil Schwartau]

Now might be a good time to remove me from my other QA components, as well.
Not that Bob should take them all! - but to some generic value. I'm still
listed as QA for LiveConnect, Rhino, etc.

Comment 4

[Bob Clary [:bc] (inactive)]

mrbkap has agreed to help out on JavaScript Engine QA although his time is
limited. We both like an alias.

For JavaScript Engine QA, how about [e-mail] ?

Since default owner of LiveConnect is [e-mail], you could
assign the default qa to [e-mail] or to
[e-mail] or [e-mail]. 

For Rhino, how about [e-mail] ?

Comment 5

[Asa Dotzler [:asa]]

Dave, can you create the dummy account for us?

Comment 6

[Brendan Eich [:brendan]]

We have [e-mail] already being used as QA Contact by default
(see e.g. bug 287630).  Are we done?

/be

Comment 7

[Bob Clary [:bc] (inactive)]

Phil is still listed as the qa for Java: Live Connect, XPConnect and xpidl. We
might as well set up aliases for them unless the owners have other suggestions. 

dbradley, kyle?

Comment 8

[Kyle Yuan]

I don't have any objection for the change of liveconnect qa.

Comment 9

[David Bradley]

Sounds fine to me

Comment 10

[Dave Miller [:justdave]]

(In reply to comment #5)
> Dave, can you create the dummy account for us?

(In reply to comment #6)
> We have [e-mail] already being used as QA Contact by default
> (see e.g. bug 287630).  Are we done?

So do you need an address or don't you?

Comment 11

[Brendan Eich [:brendan]]

Dave, it's really up to bclary et al.  I just observed that we have a made-up
address already being used for QA Contact for SpiderMonkey bugs, but comment 4
asked for more addresses, and a different one than what's being used now for
core js engine bugs.

/be

Comment 12

[Bob Clary [:bc] (inactive)]

I don't know what procedure timeless used to choose or generate the alias he
used for jseng qa, but suggest that he follow the same procedure and go ahead
for Live Connect, XPConnect and xpidl.

Comment 13

[Reed Loden [:reed]]

Updated Default Assignee to: '[e-mail]'.

Updated Default QA Contact to '[e-mail]'.