Closed
Bug 283538
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
ampersands in HTTP header must be '&' not '&'
Categories
(Core :: Networking: HTTP, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: rn214, Assigned: darin.moz)
References
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041009 Firefox/1.0 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041009 Firefox/1.0 I'm not certain whether this is a bug per se, but it is certainly strange behaviour. When one writes a normal link, it should be written thus: <a href="http://www.example.com/index.php?foo=bar&baz=wombat">right</a> although firefox will usually forgive the incorrect link: href="http://www.example.com/index.php?foo=bar&baz=wombat">wrong</a> But doing the same with an HTTP header redirect, results in failure: Firefox does not interpret the character entity. Eg the following php snippet should result in a firefox redirecting to this URL: http://www.example.com/index.php?foo=bar&baz=wombat <? $redirect_location='http://www.example.com/index.php?foo=bar&baz=wombat'; header("Location: $redirect_location"); ?> But it doesn't. The & is not evaluated, and we end up at the URL: http://www.example.com/index.php?foo=bar&baz=wombat which means that the server cannot set the value of baz. Thus, in normal links, one *must* use '&' , whereas in HTTP header redirects, one must *not* use '&'. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: This behaviour also occurs in Mozilla and Konqueror. The w3c validator validates both types of HTTP header. Expected Results: Perhaps Firefox should accept either type of encoding (& or &) in an HTTP header? Sorry if this is not a bug at all. The behaviour is strange, and inconsistent, and has caused problems with my own website. However, I may be completely in error, in which case, I apologise for wasting your time.
Updated•20 years ago
|
Assignee: firefox → darin
Component: General → Networking: HTTP
Product: Firefox → Core
QA Contact: general → networking.http
Version: unspecified → Trunk
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
This is not a bug - in that HTTP is not HTML, and the '&' character in an HTTP header is perfectly valid, without denoting a character entity. However, it might nevertheless be worth interpreting '&' on the princple of "do as I mean, not as I say".
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
>Perhaps Firefox should accept either type of encoding (& or &) in an HTTP
>header?
we won't start to parse HTTP headers as HTML. this is not a bug.Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Comment 4•18 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 348585 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•