Closed
Bug 286273
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Release Notes for Bugzilla 2.18.1
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Bugzilla-General, defect, P1)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Bugzilla 2.18
People
(Reporter: mkanat, Assigned: mkanat)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(2 files, 2 obsolete files)
|
4.08 KB,
patch
|
justdave
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
|
52.73 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
We need to modify the release notes on the 2.18.1 branch. When you do so, please
remember to carry over the changes also to the tip, although you may have to do
this cleverly.
Hopefully the relnote keyword should help us with this.
| Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Priority: -- → P1
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.18
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
OK, here they are.
We also need to update the 2.18 Release Notes on the tip, because they
apparently aren't in sync with the branch.
Assignee: general → mkanat
Attachment #178765 -
Flags: review?(justdave)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
Attachment #178765 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #183212 -
Flags: review?(kevin.benton)
| Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #178765 -
Flags: review?(justdave)
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 183212 [details] [diff] [review]
Release Notes with a Link to the SecAdvs
Suggest adding hyperlink to the full change listing. Also, per your request,
should update URL for security changes (2.16.7 currently). Wondering out loud
- should "Detailed Version-To-Version Release Notes" be changed to "Detailed
Version-To-Version Release Notes (pre-2.18)"?
There are a number of places in the document where it still reports 2.18.
Consider updating the vast majority to 2.18.1.
PP 5 (L15) reports the document as preliminary. Is this still the case?
Attachment #183212 -
Flags: review?(kevin.benton) → review-
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3)
> PP 5 (L15) reports the document as preliminary. Is this still the case?
That's only on the tip, which has the wrong release notes. Only the 2.18
branch has the right release notes. I'm going to fix that when I check in these
release notes. :-)
All your other comments are spot-on. :-)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
OK, this version should be complete, now.
Attachment #183212 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
| Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #183242 -
Flags: review?
Comment on attachment 183242 [details] [diff] [review]
v3
>+Two security issues were fixed in Bugzilla 2.18.1, neither of them
>+critical.
>+
>+See <A href="http://www.bugzilla.org/security/2.16.8/">http://www.bugzilla.org/security/2.16.8/</A> for details.
shouldn't that be http://www.bugzilla.org/security/2.18.1/
| Assignee | ||
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #6)
> shouldn't that be http://www.bugzilla.org/security/2.18.1/
The directories are named after the earliest *affected* version. That's how
they all work, for the security advisories.
| Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Flags: blocking2.18.1?
Flags: approval2.18?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
Oh, actually, this is also getting checked-in on the tip, but the patch will be
slightly different.
The end result will be that the branch release notes and the tip release notes
will be identical. (There are not any release notes for 2.20 yet.)
Flags: approval?
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #183242 -
Flags: review? → review+
Updated•20 years ago
|
Flags: blocking2.18.1?
Flags: blocking2.18.1+
Flags: approval?
Flags: approval2.18?
Flags: approval2.18+
Flags: approval+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
2.18:
Checking in docs/rel_notes.txt;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/docs/rel_notes.txt,v <-- rel_notes.txt
new revision: 1.24.2.8; previous revision: 1.24.2.7
done
Tip:
Checking in docs/rel_notes.txt;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/docs/rel_notes.txt,v <-- rel_notes.txt
new revision: 1.30; previous revision: 1.29
done
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
| Assignee | ||
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
Here's the tip version of the patch -- it makes the tip relnotes identical to
the 2.18 branch relnotes, when before the tip relnotes were actually *older*
than the 2.18 relnotes. :-)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•