currently, basically all of them are noscript. nsISocketProvider has to, since it deals with PRNetAddresses, but the rest don't. Also, various files in that dir are not part of the build.
Created attachment 177754 [details] [diff] [review] patch not sure whether the nsISOCKSSocketInfo change is worth it, since it does not make the interface very scriptable. Also, the nsISocketProviderService change isn't all that helpful. I figured they didn't hurt though.
14 years ago
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Priority: -- → P1
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.8beta2
Comment on attachment 177754 [details] [diff] [review] patch r+sr=darin
Removing nsISOCKS4SocketProvider.idl; /cvsroot/mozilla/netwerk/socket/base/nsISOCKS4SocketProvider.idl,v <-- nsISOCKS4SocketProvider.idl new revision: delete; previous revision: 1.2 done Checking in nsISOCKSSocketInfo.idl; /cvsroot/mozilla/netwerk/socket/base/nsISOCKSSocketInfo.idl,v <-- nsISOCKSSocketInfo.idl new revision: 1.5; previous revision: 1.4 done Removing nsISOCKSSocketProvider.idl; /cvsroot/mozilla/netwerk/socket/base/nsISOCKSSocketProvider.idl,v <-- nsISOCKSSocketProvider.idl new revision: delete; previous revision: 1.4 done Checking in nsISocketProvider.idl; /cvsroot/mozilla/netwerk/socket/base/nsISocketProvider.idl,v <-- nsISocketProvider.idl new revision: 1.13; previous revision: 1.12 done Checking in nsISocketProviderService.idl; /cvsroot/mozilla/netwerk/socket/base/nsISocketProviderService.idl,v <-- nsISocketProviderService.idl new revision: 1.8; previous revision: 1.7 done Checking in nsITransportSecurityInfo.idl; /cvsroot/mozilla/netwerk/socket/base/nsITransportSecurityInfo.idl,v <-- nsITransportSecurityInfo.idl new revision: 1.6; previous revision: 1.5 done Removing nsSOCKS4SocketProvider.cpp; /cvsroot/mozilla/netwerk/socket/base/nsSOCKS4SocketProvider.cpp,v <-- nsSOCKS4SocketProvider.cpp new revision: delete; previous revision: 1.5 done
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Created attachment 177914 [details] [diff] [review] branch patch [I can't figure out which combination of flags I should request if I want this for both the 1.7 branch and the aviary branch. please grant whichever combination is appropriate] same patch, for the 1.7 branch. does not contain file removals, nor the rename of the native type in nsISocketProvider.idl since this just changes some interfaces from [noscript] to [scriptable], this should be quite low-risk.
Comment on attachment 177914 [details] [diff] [review] branch patch too late for 1.0.2 and 1.7.6.
14 years ago
Comment on attachment 177914 [details] [diff] [review] branch patch We're not taking changes for Aviary 1.0.x other than security fixes and regressions along the Aviary 1.0.x series (i.e., regressions from security fixes).
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.