Closed Bug 287026 Opened 19 years ago Closed 19 years ago

Ways to open links in new tabs

Categories

(Firefox :: Tabbed Browser, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 105547

People

(Reporter: bugs, Assigned: bugs)

Details

It would be nice if we can find a way to open links in a new tab from page content. 

Exposing a mechanism through script is one way, but some kind of link target is
another. 

The problem with using target e.g. <a target="_tab" ..> is that while that works
for creating an anonymous new tab, currently <a target="foo" ..> opens a new
window with name "foo" and all subsequent links targeted at "foo" will open at
it, and there seems to be no easy way of doing that since the attribute is
overloaded. Perhaps it could depend on the "Force links" preference. 

What do people think?
_tab was WONTFIX'ED in bug 105409, but we need to do something anyway

Maybe with "target-new" ? See
<http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-css3-hyperlinks-20040224/#target-new> (which is
highly controversial).
I'm a little wary of us creating Gecko-specific extensions to HTML, it's
specifically what web developers generate hate about Internet Explorer. Adding
something like <a target="_tab" ..>, which only Firefox would respect seems like
a step backwards for standards compliance (which after all, is one of MoFo's
goals, IIRC).

I'm in favour of relying on the force links preference. It lets every user
decide exactly how they want links to open.
Also I forgot to mention, the target attribute is invalid in strict document
types anyway. (Sorry for bugspam)
This looks to me like a dup of bug 105409.
This is already possible with target="_blank".

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 105547 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
OK.  One last time -- web pages should not EVER open up tabs if the user doesn't
want to see them.  Just like the should not ever open up windows if the user
doesn't want to see those.

The whole idea here is to empower the user, not the web page designer.  Given
that we have a setup in place (done by danm) that empowers the user in exactly
this way, it's not clear to me why we're still discussing the issue...
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.