Closed Bug 287026 Opened 21 years ago Closed 21 years ago

Ways to open links in new tabs

Categories

(Firefox :: Tabbed Browser, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 105547

People

(Reporter: bugs, Assigned: bugs)

Details

It would be nice if we can find a way to open links in a new tab from page content. Exposing a mechanism through script is one way, but some kind of link target is another. The problem with using target e.g. <a target="_tab" ..> is that while that works for creating an anonymous new tab, currently <a target="foo" ..> opens a new window with name "foo" and all subsequent links targeted at "foo" will open at it, and there seems to be no easy way of doing that since the attribute is overloaded. Perhaps it could depend on the "Force links" preference. What do people think?
_tab was WONTFIX'ED in bug 105409, but we need to do something anyway Maybe with "target-new" ? See <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-css3-hyperlinks-20040224/#target-new> (which is highly controversial).
I'm a little wary of us creating Gecko-specific extensions to HTML, it's specifically what web developers generate hate about Internet Explorer. Adding something like <a target="_tab" ..>, which only Firefox would respect seems like a step backwards for standards compliance (which after all, is one of MoFo's goals, IIRC). I'm in favour of relying on the force links preference. It lets every user decide exactly how they want links to open.
Also I forgot to mention, the target attribute is invalid in strict document types anyway. (Sorry for bugspam)
This looks to me like a dup of bug 105409.
This is already possible with target="_blank". *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 105547 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
OK. One last time -- web pages should not EVER open up tabs if the user doesn't want to see them. Just like the should not ever open up windows if the user doesn't want to see those. The whole idea here is to empower the user, not the web page designer. Given that we have a setup in place (done by danm) that empowers the user in exactly this way, it's not clear to me why we're still discussing the issue...
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.