287671 - The requested URL could not be retrieved with Mozilla 1.8 Beta 1; with Microsoft Internet Explorer is the URL ok.

Status: RESOLVED EXPIRED

(SeaMonkey :: General, defect)

Description

[HolgerBernhardt]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; de-AT; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050217
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; de-AT; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050217

While trying to retrieve the URL: [no URL]

The following error was encountered:

    * The request or reply is too large.

      If you are making a POST or PUT request, then your request body (the thing
you are trying to upload) is too large. If you are making a GET request, then
the reply body (what you are trying to download) is too large. These limits have
been established by the Internet Service Provider who operates this cache.
Please contact them directly if you feel this is an error. 

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.



I haven´t this problem with Mozilla 1.8 Alpha 5 or older versions.

Comment 1

[Hermann Schwab]

wfm Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050324

URL: http://www.rlpforen.de/forumdisplay.php?f=41 or http://web.de/

Please don't put two URLs into the URL: box, if you click the URL: the URL is
loaded, or you can save from it. Anyway, you can put multiple URLs into the
comments. Very long URLs are working in the URL: box, but are broken in a comment.

I don´t understand Mozillas Comments in comment 0.
Do you have extensions installed?
Are these the only non-working links?
Does it work if you click on the URLs in this comment?
Are you using a proxy?

Comment 2

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

[Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050317] (nightly) (W98SE)

WFM too.

Comment 3

[zug_treno]

Both URLs WFM with Mozilla 1.8b1, could this error message come from a Squid
proxy that you didn't use with IE?

Comment 4

[HolgerBernhardt]

.... Squid proxy that you didn't use with IE?
I use the proxy with IE too.

Do you have extensions installed?
No

Are these the only non-working links?
Yes

Does it work if you click on the URLs in this comment?
No

Comment 5

[HolgerBernhardt]

Are these the only non-working links?

http://www.wallstreet-online.de/

Comment 6

[zug_treno]

(In reply to comment #5)
> http://www.wallstreet-online.de/

WFM with 1.8b1, but I don't use Squid (or another proxy). Did you try changing
the various Connection Options (File>Preferences...>Advanced>HTTP Networking)? 

Comment 7

[zug_treno]

Ehh, make that Edit>Preferences...>Advanced>HTTP Networking.

Comment 8

[HolgerBernhardt]

Edit>Preferences...>Advanced>HTTP Networking

HTTP 1.0 with Keep-Alive and without Keep-Alive
HTTP 1.1 with Pipeling and without Pipeling

it isn´t the solution.

Comment 9

[Gervase Markham [:gerv]]

This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01".

This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that
bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are
highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code.

While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we
are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce
this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a
copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and
you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug
(given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more
reproduction information if you have it.

If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not
changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved.
Thank you for your help in this matter.

The latest beta releases can be obtained from:
Firefox:     http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/
Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html
Seamonkey:   http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/

Comment 10

[Gervase Markham [:gerv]]

This bug has been automatically resolved after a period of inactivity (see above
comment). If anyone thinks this is incorrect, they should feel free to reopen it.