Closed
Bug 288030
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
Firefox is trying to download a perl script instead of executing it
Categories
(Core :: Networking: HTTP, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: kdalley, Assigned: darin.moz)
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050317 Firefox/1.0.2 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050317 Firefox/1.0.2 On our internal website, we have a phonelist using a perl script "phonesearch.pl" and when I upgraded to the latest Firefox version 1.0.2, Firefox started trying to download the script instead of executing it and showing the results in the web browser. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. type in search name and hit enter/click search 2. server responds with a perl script 3. Actual Results: Firefox brought up the save as/download popup Expected Results: Firefox needs to execute the script per normal usage prior to v1.0.2
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
It works with 1.0.1 but not with 1.0.2 ? Do you get the same result if you start Firefox in the safemode ?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
I just tried it in Safe Mode and it's doing the same thing.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
I'm can't remember if I had 1.0.1 or 1.0 previous to upgrading. I think it was 1.0.1
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
I'm attaching a screenprint of the download screen that I'm getting.
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
Can you pelase generate a http log (it`s the same for Firefox..): http://www.mozilla.org/projects/netlib/http/http-debugging.html
| Reporter | ||
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
Here's the log file created.
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
hmm, the server seems to be confused... 2312[162bd68]: http response [ 2312[162bd68]: HTTP/1.1 200 OK 2312[162bd68]: Server: Microsoft-IIS/5.0 2312[162bd68]: Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:08:04 GMT 2312[162bd68]: Connection: close 2312[162bd68]: Content-Type: application/octet-stream 2312[162bd68]: Unquoted: \Inetpub\Scripts\phone\phonesearch.pl line 212., \Inetpub\Scripts\phone\phonesearch.pl line 216., \Inetpub\Scripts\phone\phonesearch.pl line 217., \Inetpub\Scripts\phone\phonesearch.pl line 218., \Inetpub\Scripts\phone\phonesearch.pl line 219., \Inetpub\Scripts\phone\phonesearch.pl line 220., \Inetpub\Scripts\phone\phonesearch.pl line 225. 2312[162bd68]: <title>Corporate: Systems</title> 2312[162bd68]: <meta: name="Keywords" content="">, name="Description" content="">, name="Abstract" content="">, name="Owner" content="Corporate Systems Inc.">, name="Author" content="Terry Apodaca webmaster@csedge.com">, name="Copyright" content="Copyright (c) 2003 - 2004 by Corporate Systems, Inc.">, name="Robots" content="index,follow">, http-equiv="pragma" content="no-cache">, http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> 2312[162bd68]: <link: rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/include/csedge.css"> 2312[162bd68]: ] The server sends the wrong mime-type if I look at that log and it seems that Mozilla is parsing a part of the content itself as http Header. Darin: Do you know why this should work and not in 1.0.2 ? Reporter: Are you able to change the IIS configuration to send "text/html" for .pl ? (http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/iis/6/all/proddocs/en-us/wsa_mimemapcfg.mspx)
Assignee: firefox → darin
Component: General → Networking: HTTP
Product: Firefox → Core
QA Contact: general → networking.http
Version: unspecified → 1.7 Branch
| Reporter | ||
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
I really don't have any control over what's being sent. It's setup on our intraNet server. Just an fyi, I've also got IE v 6.0.2800.1106CO and it is working fine.
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
>Reporter: Are you able to change the IIS configuration to send "text/html" for
> .pl ?
? The perl script generates the content-type header, not the server configuration...
Comment 10•19 years ago
|
||
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more reproduction information if you have it. If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. Thank you for your help in this matter. The latest beta releases can be obtained from: Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
| Assignee | ||
Comment 11•19 years ago
|
||
The server is screwed up. There's nothing in the HTTP log that implicates any problem with the browser. I don't know why it worked with Firefox 1.0. Maybe the server has some broken User-Agent sniffing logic. Marking INVALID.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•