288594 - eurofoto.no say my browser is wrong. Please send evangelism e-mail.

Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE

(Tech Evangelism Graveyard :: Norwegian, defect)

Description

[Toralf Lund]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050226 Firefox/1.0.1
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050226 Firefox/1.0.1

When I reported a problem with the above mentioned webside, I got a reply (from
Vegar Sårheim via RT <[e-mail]>) that it was probably caused by my web
browser, and that they recommend Explorer 6.0.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Enough said, probably, but the actual problem may be reproduced as follows:

While displaying a picture:

1. Select "Roter Venstre"
2. Repeat
3. Select "Roter Høyre"
4. Repeat
 
Actual Results:  
1. The picture is rotated 90 degrees.
2. The picture is rotated back to the original orientation.
3-4. Exactly as 1-2 (same direction of rotation)


Expected Results:  
Obviously, in 3) the picture should be rotated in the opposite direction from 1).

The behaviour for to 2) is also dubious; the picture should probably be rotated
once more in the same direction.

Comment 1

[alge]

Reporter: Could you try to get a working testcase by using 
fil->lagre nettside som-> then select "nettside, komplett"?
And if it works locally (and reproduces the rotating bug), please
upload it somewhere we can see it or upload a zip of the folder
to this bug report.

Comment 2

[Toralf Lund]

The "save" function does not seem to include all the data needed for a working
test setup, I'm afraid (because JavaScript is involved?)

Meanwhile, I think I've been able to convince eurofoto tech support the their
site, and not my browser, is buggy. Some "evangelism" might still be needed
though, since their general position seems to be that problems encountered in
browsers different from IE are not worth investigating.

Comment 3

[Chris Lawson (gone)]

Site's been extensively redesigned, but without a specific album to try this on (or a login + an album to try this on), we can't do much about any further investigation. I assume this has probably been fixed, but marking INCOMPLETE since we don't have any way to know for sure.