Closed
Bug 289351
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
Attachment list printout gets excessively long if many attachments
Categories
(Thunderbird :: General, enhancement)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
EXPIRED
People
(Reporter: chase1989, Assigned: mscott)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050317 Firefox/1.0.2 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050317 Firefox/1.0.2 When printing a message that has a lot of attachments, several pages can be printed that are just tables of attachment information. Each attachment is printed in its own table that also includes information on mime type and content encoding. I feel that it wastes space and just a comma-delimited list at the end of the message would do. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Receive (or send yourself) a message that has quite a few attachments (i.e., 7 or 8) 2. Print that message. Actual Results: The message was printed, as well as a large table for each attachment including name, mime type, and content encoding. Expected Results: The message will be printed, and instead just a comma-delimited list of the files be printed, perhaps up with the other headers.
I am troubled with the same issue, when subscribing to maling lists sending me mails with 30+ attachments (emails .eml). Using "display attachments inline" will show all the attachements inline, of cause, and in the attachment list attachment with subject. And gives me like 6 to 12 lines of actual mail view area for the email, depending on if header info is expanded, this being in full screen (1200x1080) Not using "display attachments inline" will not show all the attachements inline, of cause, and in the attachment list, attachment with no subject simply named "ForwardedMessage.eml", not very useful when the mails are not inline and you need to open the attachement to see what it is. In this mode I get between 20-30 lines of view area for the email. What about limiting the attachement area by added in scrollbar, and enable the used to resize the areas. Enabling some more user choices on how attachments should be displayed would be nice. Like in a normal file browser.
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
I just received a message that has more than 145 attachments (I can't tell how many because I can only see the first 145), and the attachment list takes up my whole screen, making the message itself unreadable. I can't even get to all of the attachments easily to view and save them. A limited-size attachment section with a scrollbar would help immensely.
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more reproduction information if you have it. If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. Thank you for your help in this matter. The latest beta releases can be obtained from: Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
This bug has been automatically resolved after a period of inactivity (see above comment). If anyone thinks this is incorrect, they should feel free to reopen it.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → EXPIRED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•