Closed
Bug 289858
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Expose number of children for a given tree item
Categories
(Core :: Disability Access APIs, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: aaronlev, Assigned: aaronlev)
Details
(Keywords: access)
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
For tree item accessibles, we don't currently expose the number of children in a way that is efficient for an AT to get to.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
Attachment #180347 -
Flags: review?(pkwarren)
| Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #180347 -
Flags: review?(pkwarren)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
Attachment #180347 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #180362 -
Flags: review?(pkwarren)
| Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #180362 -
Flags: review?(pkwarren) → review?(timeless)
| Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #180362 -
Flags: superreview?(neil.parkwaycc.co.uk)
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 180362 [details] [diff] [review] Also remove unnecessary value support for tree items and make sure we don't expose this discription for lists implemented with a tree >+ // Count the number of children You do know that in general it's not possible to know how many potential children a collapsed parent has, right? All of these methods just return the number of visible children. >+ testRow = mRow; >+ PRInt32 numChildren = 0; >+ while (++ testRow < numRows) { >+ PRInt32 testLevel = 0; >+ mTreeView->GetLevel(testRow, &testLevel); >+ if (testLevel != level + 1) { >+ break; >+ } >+ ++ numChildren; >+ } This needs to work like the loop for the number of siblings, i.e. you only want to count the immediate children, and you should only break when the testLevel <= level. sr=me with these nits addressed.
Attachment #180362 -
Flags: superreview?(neil.parkwaycc.co.uk) → superreview+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 180362 [details] [diff] [review] Also remove unnecessary value support for tree items and make sure we don't expose this discription for lists implemented with a tree Timeless gave r= on IRC. Neil's nits will be addressed.
Attachment #180362 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Attachment #180362 -
Flags: review+
Attachment #180362 -
Flags: approval1.8b2?
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 180362 [details] [diff] [review] Also remove unnecessary value support for tree items and make sure we don't expose this discription for lists implemented with a tree a=asa
Attachment #180362 -
Flags: approval1.8b2? → approval1.8b2+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
Checking in src/msaa/nsAccessibleWrap.cpp; /cvsroot/mozilla/accessible/src/msaa/nsAccessibleWrap.cpp,v <-- nsAccessibleWrap.cpp new revision: 1.26; previous revision: 1.25 done Checking in src/msaa/nsXULTreeAccessibleWrap.cpp; /cvsroot/mozilla/accessible/src/msaa/nsXULTreeAccessibleWrap.cpp,v <-- nsXULTreeAccessibleWrap.cpp new revision: 1.5; previous revision: 1.4 done Checking in src/xul/nsXULTreeAccessible.cpp; /cvsroot/mozilla/accessible/src/xul/nsXULTreeAccessible.cpp,v <-- nsXULTreeAccessible.cpp new revision: 1.32; previous revision: 1.31 done Checking in src/xul/nsXULTreeAccessible.h; /cvsroot/mozilla/accessible/src/xul/nsXULTreeAccessible.h,v <-- nsXULTreeAccessible.h new revision: 1.16; previous revision: 1.15 done
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•