Closed
Bug 290941
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
XUL <checkbox> does not support readonly
Categories
(Core :: XUL, enhancement)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
EXPIRED
People
(Reporter: tbs, Unassigned)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050412 Firefox/1.0+ Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050412 Firefox/1.0+ Unlike other XULElements (e.g. <textbox>) the <checkbox> does not support the readonly attribute. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
Updated•20 years ago
|
Assignee: firefox → nobody
Component: General → XP Toolkit/Widgets: XUL
Product: Firefox → Core
QA Contact: general
Version: unspecified → 1.0 Branch
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
It doesn't because you can't type into it. Are you thinking of "disabled", which is supported?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
No - that would grey out the label. I am looking for a non-grayed readonly checkbox ; just as a a readonly textbox.
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
I don't understand why. A readonly only checkbox would serve no purpose whatsoever if it couldn't be changed. Could you give an example of what you would like to do?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
I am displaying data from a database, that all users are allowed to see, but only certain users allowed to edit. So I would use readonly for the unprivileged users, and "not-readonly" for the privileged users. I am using the checkboxes to display booleans from the database.
Comment 5•19 years ago
|
||
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more reproduction information if you have it. If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. Thank you for your help in this matter. The latest beta releases can be obtained from: Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
Comment 6•19 years ago
|
||
This bug has been automatically resolved after a period of inactivity (see above comment). If anyone thinks this is incorrect, they should feel free to reopen it.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → EXPIRED
Component: XP Toolkit/Widgets: XUL → XUL
QA Contact: xptoolkit.widgets
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•