User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; da-DK; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050414 Firefox/1.0.3 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; da-DK; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050414 Firefox/1.0.3 I have testet with Linux, Windows98, Windows Millenium and Windows XP. It's the same bug. There is a difference when using Linux though. None of the browsers in Linux - Mandrake 10.1 could show the site without the error. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.click on products 2.you will see text errors 3.try to choose a product .. the underlined links Actual Results: nothing you got stuck Expected Results: show text without problems, and let me point and click on the links for products
That page only works in IE, not in any other browser like Firefox or Opera. Tech Evan ?
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more reproduction information if you have it. If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. Thank you for your help in this matter. The latest beta releases can be obtained from: Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
This bug has been automatically resolved after a period of inactivity (see above comment). If anyone thinks this is incorrect, they should feel free to reopen it.