Closed
Bug 292703
Opened 19 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
Flood of alarms / Crash when recurring event initial date moved back in time
Categories
(Calendar :: Internal Components, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 229916
People
(Reporter: silcndude, Assigned: shaver)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050418 Firefox/1.0.3 (Debian package 1.0.3-1) Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050418 Firefox/1.0.3 (Debian package 1.0.3-1) Calendar alarm code is highly buggy and apparently untested. This crash-inducing bug is one of many similar issues I have discovered. In some ways it seems a little silly to file a bunch of bugs because the alarm code is alpha quality at best and most bugs would probably disappear with a day of casual code review and testing. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create an event that repeats fairly regularly (daily, bi-weekly, etc.) 2. Add an alarm to the event 3. Move the initial event date back a bit (say one month earlier than today's date) Actual Results: Flood of alarm windows pop up, CPU at 100%, effectively crashes Calendar or must kill it to restore system. Expected Results: When moving a recurring event back in time, disable the alarm for all events up until the current date/time. In general, old events past a certain age should not cause alarm triggers regardless. This causes problems when a user is out for a week and misses a bunch of events with alarms. Perhaps there should be a setting like "expire alarms older than 3 days." In addition, multiple missed alarms should ideally show in one window so that the user can review and dismiss them at once.
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
Reporter: This seems like it might just be another way of creating bug 229916. Can you take a look at that bug and see if you agree? If so, please resolve this bug as a duplicate of that one.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•19 years ago
|
||
The alarm service is also entirely different on the trunk (and just aborning this week, in fact). I look forward to your code review and testing of that code, though!
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
No response from reporter. Resolving duplicate. (see comment #2) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 229916 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•