Closed Bug 293496 Opened 20 years ago Closed 13 years ago

128 bit encryption is not documented anywhere in installed product

Categories

(support.mozilla.org :: Knowledge Base Articles, task)

task
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED INVALID

People

(Reporter: lindyboi, Unassigned)

References

Details

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050414 Firefox/1.0.3
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050414 Firefox/1.0.3

I had to do an online search in order to find out whether or not firefox
supported 128 bit encryption.



Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Viewed online help
2. Looked for security contents (nada)
3. Looked for encryption or 128 in index (nada)
4. Went to preferences
5. AFter digging, found "security"
6. cryptic terms SSL 2.0, SSL 3.0 but no mention of 128 bit encryption that is
explicitly mentioned on many sites
7. Searched mozilla.org/firefox/ for "encrypt" - still nothing about 128 bit

Actual Results:  
I went to google to find out if the browser supported encryption, had to dig
through several sites.
Depends on: 250393
Summary: 128 bit encryption is not documented anywhere in online help → 128 bit encryption is not documented anywhere in installed product
There is some information in the glossary entry for secure site. An option to
make this more discoverable would be to add an entry to the contents say
'Using Firefox --> Navigating Web Pages --> Viewing Secure Sites' mostly using
the info from the aforementioned glossary entry and explicitly mentioning
support for high grade 128bit and 256bit SSL encryption as well as perhaps a
secure site location bar screenshot.

If people think this is a good idea I can try to whip up a patch.
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01".

This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that
bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are
highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code.

While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we
are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce
this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a
copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and
you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug
(given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more
reproduction information if you have it.

If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not
changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved.
Thank you for your help in this matter.

The latest beta releases can be obtained from:
Firefox:     http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/
Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html
Seamonkey:   http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
This bug has been automatically resolved after a period of inactivity (see above
comment). If anyone thinks this is incorrect, they should feel free to reopen it.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → EXPIRED
We still want to consider this, although I doubt spitting mumbo-jumbo numbers in
help docs is really going to be useful.  This needs more consideration than
that, tho, to close it.
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: EXPIRED → ---
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
OS: Windows XP → All
Hardware: PC → All
Severity: normal → enhancement
Moving over to sumo.
Component: Help Documentation → Knowledge Base Articles
Product: Firefox → Sumo
QA Contact: help.documentation → kb-articles
According to https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/how-the-knowledge-base-works, article requests are no longer tracked in Bugzilla.

Reporter, if you consider your request is still applicable, post a new thread describing the content with "[Proposed] Name of the article" as title in https://support.mozilla.com/forums/knowledge-base-articles

I close this bug as invalid.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago13 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.